HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 27 July, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 27, 2026.

GST

  1. DEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but Not Eligible ITC Under TNVAT: Madras High Court
  2. GST Dept. Can’t Attach Bank Accounts of Independent Firms to Recover Another Company’s Tax Dues: Madras High Court
  3. Arrest Can’t Be Routine Without Need for Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Rs. 95 Crore Fake ITC Case
  4. Validity of Consolidated GST SCN for Multiple Financial Years Upheld: Gauhati High Court 
  5. Absence of Mandatory Approval in GST S. 74 Adjudication, Karnataka High Court Restrained Dept. from Coercive Action
  6. GSTAT Mumbai Bench to Commence Hearings from July 27
  7. GSTAT Bar Association Seeks Urgent Procedural Clarifications on Appeal Filing, Defect Removal and Cross-Objections Before Jodhpur Bench
  8. CBIC Constitutes Working Group to Examine Centralised GST Administration for Taxpayers with Multiple GSTINs
  9. CBIC Clarifies Departmental Appeal Procedure Before GSTAT in DGGI Cases Involving Common Adjudicating Authorities
  10. Whether Dept. Can Invoke S. 73 Without Challenging Refund Sanction Order? Telangana High Court Stays GST Refund Recovery 
  11. GST on 36 Life-Saving Drugs Reduced to Nil: Finance Ministry

Service Tax 

  1. Time-Barred SCN Can’t Sustain Service Tax Demand Against Sub-Contractor: CESTAT
  2. Redemption Fine Can’t Be Ground to Reject SVLDRS Declaration: Rajasthan High Court

Customs Duty

  1. CA Certificate Sufficient to Rebut Unjust Enrichment in Customs Refund Claims: Karnataka HC

Income Tax

  1. Client Code Modification Allegations Can’t Stand Without Independent Evidence: ITAT 
  2. ITAT Can’t Quash Penalty Solely Because Assessment Was Earlier Quashed: Karnataka High Court
  3. FCCB Redemption Premium Qualifies as Revenue Expenditure: Delhi HC 
  4. Income Tax Penalty Can’t Survive After ITAT Quashes Assessment Order: Delhi HC Quashes Rs. 9.30 Crore Demand
  5. Unsigned S. 148 Notice Invalidates Reassessment Proceedings: ITAT Quashes Entire Income Tax Assessment
  6. S. 56(2)(x) Can’t Tax Redevelopment Flats Before Possession; Registration of Agreement Alone Doesn’t Amount to ‘Receipt’: ITAT
  7. CBDT Circular Can’t Override Jurisdictional Defect: ITAT Refuses to Recall Low Tax Effect Dismissal
  8. Inadvertent Omission in Form 3CD Due to Software Error Can’t Attract Penalty Under S. 271B: ITAT
  9. No TDS on Branch-to-Head Office Remittances: Delhi High Court

Excise Duty

  1. Revenue Neutrality Must Be Proven with Evidence, Not Assumptions: Madras High Court Restores Rs. 20.37 Crore Excise Demand

Company & PMLA

  1. IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint
  2. S. 45 PMLA Twin Conditions Not Satisfied in Alleged Rs. 76.29 Crore Money Laundering Case: Calcutta High Court Refuses Bail to Sahara Executive
  3. Courts Can’t Ignore S. 45 Twin Conditions in Money Laundering Cases: Calcutta High Court Cancels PMLA Bail
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...

DEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but Not Eligible ITC Under TNVAT: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that while Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) licences qualify...

More like this

IBC Moratorium Doesn’t Shield Directors from Consumer Proceedings: Supreme Court Revives Homebuyers’ Complaint

The Supreme Court has clarified that the moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the...

Courts Can’t Impose Impractical Conditions That Frustrate Investigation: Supreme Court Relaxes Police Custody Restrictions

The Supreme Court has held that while safeguards against custodial abuse are essential, courts...

DEPB Licences Are ‘Goods’ but Not Eligible ITC Under TNVAT: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that while Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) licences qualify...