Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.

GST

  1. SUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN GST DISPUTE OVER BOT TOLL PROJECTS
  2. BOMBAY HIGH COURT GRANTS INTERIM PROTECTION AGAINST POST-SAFARI RETREATS ITC DEMAND; RESTRAINS COERCIVE RECOVERY FROM HOTEL DEVELOPER
  3. NO GST REFUND IF APPEAL BEFORE GSTAT IS FILED LATE: GUJARAT HIGH COURT
  4. MERE UPLOAD OF GST NOTICE ON PORTAL NOT VALID SERVICE, APPEAL LIMITATION WON’T START: PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
  5. GST REGISTRATION CANCELLATION CAN’T BE CANCELLED WITHOUT PERSONAL HEARING: PATNA HIGH COURT 
  6. CAN’T CHALLENGE GST DEMAND AFTER GIVING UNDERTAKING, POST-DATED CHEQUES: PATNA HIGH COURT
  7. PORTAL UPLOAD ALONE IS NOT VALID SERVICE OF NOTICE: PATNA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST REGISTRATION CANCELLATION
  8. GSTAT SPECIAL BENCH TO DECIDE WHETHER DELAY BEYOND S. 107 TIME LIMIT CAN BE CONDONED
  9. APPEAL FILED WITHIN 21 DAYS MUST BE HEARD WITHOUT LIMITATION OBJECTION: GAUHATI HIGH COURT EXTENDS INTERIM PROTECTION IN GST DISPUTE

Service Tax

  1. NO SERVICE TAX DEMAND WITHOUT PROOF OF SERVICE OF SCN: CESTAT 

Customs Duty

  1. PARTS MUST BE CLASSIFIED WITH PARENT PRINTERS: CUSTOMS DEPT. DROPS ₹23.63 LAKH DUTY DEMAND ON INKJET PRINTHEADS [READ ORDER]

Income Tax

  1. CA PARTNER CAN CLAIM S. 44ADA PRESUMPTIVE TAXATION ON PARTNERSHIP REMUNERATION: ITAT
  2. SPORTS CLUB’S BONA FIDE BELIEF ON MUTUALITY BARS TAX AUDIT DEFAULT: ITAT DELETES S. 271B PENALTY
  3. CBDT EXPANDS DEFINITION OF ‘SPECIFIED FUND’ UNDER INCOME-TAX RULES, BRINGS MORE INVESTMENT FUNDS WITHIN TAX FRAMEWORK
  4. UNSIGNED REASSESSMENT NOTICE INVALID: ITAT QUASHES ENTIRE INCOME TAX REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
  5. ASSESSMENT REMAINS VALID EVEN IF S.143(2) NOTICE IS NOT IN CBDT PRESCRIBED FORMAT: ITAT

Corporate Law

  1. IPL SOUTH AFRICA REMITTANCES WERE CURRENT ACCOUNT TRANSACTIONS: SAFEMA TRIBUNAL QUASHES FEMA PENALTIES AGAINST BCCI, SBI OFFICIALS
  2. AMENDMENT TO COMPANY PETITION CAN BE ALLOWED EVEN IF LIMITATION IS DISPUTED: NCLAT

Others

  1. CBI FILES 17,000 PAGE CHARGESHEET AGAINST RAJESH BOTHRA OVER ALLEGED FAKE BILLS OF LADING IN ROTOMAC BANK FRAUD CASE
  2. CAN POLICE CHARGE BANKS FOR ASSISTING SARFAESI ASSET RECOVERY? RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT EXAMINES LEGAL VALIDITY
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...