Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationCBDT Expands Definition of ‘Specified Fund’ Under Income-tax Rules, Brings More Investment...

CBDT Expands Definition of ‘Specified Fund’ Under Income-tax Rules, Brings More Investment Funds Within Tax Framework

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has notified the Income-tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2026, widening the scope of the term “specified fund” under the Income-tax Rules, 2026. 

The amendment is aimed at aligning the Income-tax Rules with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and broadening the categories of investment funds eligible under the tax framework. 

The amendment has been issued by the CBDT in exercise of powers conferred under Section 533 read with Section 262 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and came into force immediately upon its publication in the Official Gazette on 21 July 2026. 

Buy Now: INCOME TAX E-COMPILATION – JUNE 2026

The notification substitutes clause (c) of sub-rule (5) of Rule 157 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026, which defines the expression “specified fund.”

Under the revised provision, a “specified fund” now includes any fund established or incorporated in India as a trust, company, limited liability partnership (LLP), or body corporate that has been granted registration as a Category I or Category II Alternative Investment Fund (AIF).

The fund must be regulated either by the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012, or the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Fund Management) Regulations, 2022, provided the fund is located in an International Financial Services Centre (IFSC). 

The amendment further expands the definition by expressly including any fund referred to in Schedule VI [Note 1(g)] of the Income-tax Act, 2025 within the meaning of a “specified fund.” This addition broadens the range of investment vehicles that may qualify under the relevant tax provisions. 

The notification appears to harmonize the Income-tax Rules with the newly enacted Income-tax Act, 2025, ensuring that the regulatory treatment of investment funds under the Rules corresponds with the categories recognized under the Act.

The amendment also recognizes funds operating in India’s International Financial Services Centres, reflecting the government’s continued emphasis on promoting IFSCs as globally competitive financial hubs while providing tax certainty to regulated investment structures. 

Since the notification specifies that the amendment takes effect from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette, the revised definition of “specified fund” is applicable from 21 July 2026. 

Membership Required to Access Notification Details & Copy

To view the complete Notification Details and Download Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Sports Club’s Bona Fide Belief on Mutuality Bars Tax Audit Default: ITAT Deletes S. 271B Penalty

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...