Indirect Tax Weekly Flashback: 27 July To 2 August 2025

Indirect Duty Weekly Flashback for the period from  27  July to 2 August 2025.

Supreme Court 

Stem Cell Banking Services Exempt from Service Tax: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the collection, processing, and storage of umbilical cord blood stem cells fall within the ambit of “Healthcare Services” and are therefore exempt from service tax.

Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Pulls Up CBIC Over Detention of Personal Gold Jewellery, Seeks Urgent Reform of Baggage Rules

The Delhi High Court has pressed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to expedite amendments to the Baggage Rules, 2016. The Court’s direction follows continuing legal disputes regarding the detention of personal gold  jewellery from Indian and foreign passengers.

Gold Chain Detention Impermissible as Customs Misses One-Year Deadline for Show Cause Notice: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the detention of two gold chains by the Customs Department is legally impermissible, as no show cause notice was issued even after the expiry of the one-year statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act. The Court ordered immediate release of the jewellery to the petitioner, an Uzbekistan national.

Personal Jewellery Carried Or Worn By Passenger Doesn’t Automatically Constitute Smuggling: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that  bona fide personal  jewellery carried or worn by a passenger does not automatically constitute smuggling or dutiable goods.

No Show Cause Notice, No Hearing: Delhi High Court Quashes Detention of Passenger’s Gold Ornaments 

The Delhi High Court has quashed the detention of a passenger’s gold  jewellery at IGI Airport, ruling that the customs department failed to issue a proper Show Cause Notice (SCN) or provide a personal hearing before seizing the items.

Delhi High Court Directs CESTAT to Hear Rs. 1.59 Crore Customs Dispute Despite 273-Day Delay Subject To Rs. 50K Cost

The Delhi High Court has directed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) to hear a high-value customs duty dispute on merits, setting aside a 273-day delay in filing the appeal. 

Delhi High Court Directs Customs Dept. to Release Detained Jewellery to Passenger, Waives Warehousing Charges

The Delhi High Court has directed the release of  jewellery detained by the Customs Department at IGI Airport, ruling that the items fall within the ambit of “personal effects” under the Baggage Rules. 

Bombay High Court

Videography Of DRI Statement Recording Allowed, Advocate Can Stay at Visible Distance; Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Walnuts Importer

The Bombay High Court has granted the anticipatory bail to the Walnuts importer and allowed the videography of statement recording by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the presence of Advocate at visible distance.

Karnataka High Court

Multiple SCNs and Orders Issued for Same Assessee and FY: Karnataka High Court Seeks Clarification

The Karnataka High Court has sought the clarification on multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) and Orders  for the same assessee and Financial Year (FY).

CESTAT

Service Tax Demand of Rs. 1.18 Crore on Affiliation Fees Quashed: CESTAT Says No Commercial Service Involved by University of Kota

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi in a case argued by Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal has set aside a service tax demand on affiliation fees imposed on the University of Kota quashed.  

Inherent Power Of Tribunal To Stay Of Order Determinantal To Taxes Collection: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in its order has answered the issue: Whether the Tribunal has the power to stay an order so as to make it non-existent in the eyes of the law or merely to avoid depositing additional adjudged dues during the period of appeal? The answer is yes, the Tribunal has the power to stay an order.

Only Common CENVAT Credit Reversal Required: CESTAT Strikes Down Rs. 24 Lakh Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has quashed a Rs. 24.08 lakh service tax demand and a Rs. 10 lakh penalty, holding that only common input service credit used for both taxable and exempt services is subject to reversal—not the entire CENVAT credit availed.

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.6 Crore Anti-Dumping Duty Demand Over Alloy Wheel Imports

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside a Rs. 4.6 crore anti-dumping duty (ADD) demand and penalties in a case concerning alleged misdeclaration of the country of origin of alloy  wheels imported from Taiwan.

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 17.95 Lakh Service Tax Demand on Employee Transport via Contract Carriage

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a service tax demand of Rs. 17.95 lakh along with interest and penalties, ruling that employee transportation services provided through contract carriages are exempt from service tax under applicable exemption notifications.

Mining Services Between Distinct Entities Held Taxable, Not Self-Service: CESTAT Rejects Rs. 28 Lakh Refund

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld the denial of refund claims exceeding ₹28 lakh related to service tax paid on limestone mining transactions. The Tribunal ruled that the services rendered under a joint venture mining arrangement could not be classified as “self-service” and were therefore subject to taxation under the Finance Act, 1994.

Lease Premium for Land Transfer Not A Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in New Delhi has partially set aside a Rs. 21.28 crore service tax demand imposed on the Raipur Development Authority (RDA), holding that the leasing of land and transfer of development rights did not constitute taxable services.

Customs Appeal Abates After Death of Sole Proprietor: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Chennai has dismissed a revenue appeal after holding that proceedings cannot continue following the death of a sole proprietor, in line with Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982.

Limitation Period Not Applicable for Refund of Extra Duty Deposit: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has ruled that the limitation period under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, does not apply to refund claims for Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) collected during Special Valuation Branch (SVB) investigations.

CESTAT Frowns On Service Tax Dept. for Sending Notices to Wrong Address, Sets Aside Time-Barred Dismissal

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai has strongly rebuked the Central GST authorities for serving key legal notices to an outdated address, ultimately setting aside the rejection of a service tax appeal on the grounds of limitation.

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Meerut Court Rejects Bail Plea in Rs. 9.32 Crore GST Theft 

The Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut has rejected the bail application of Somil…

CESTAT Expresses Anguish Over Disrespectful Language in Appeal Memorandum, Warns Against Derogatory Pleadings

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)…

Airport Commissionerate, Mumbai Customs Zone-III Seizes Hydroponic Weed Worth ₹33.35 Crore

In one of the largest anti-narcotics operations in recent times, officers of…