Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesMultiple SCNs and Orders Issued for Same Assessee and FY: Karnataka High...

Multiple SCNs and Orders Issued for Same Assessee and FY: Karnataka High Court Seeks Clarification

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has sought the clarification on multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) and Orders  for the same assessee and Financial Year (FY).

The petitioner challenged the multiple orders passed for the same period by different assessing officers as also multiple show cause notices issued for the very same period. In that view of the matter, the operation and execution of order dated 7.12.2023 (uploaded online on 30.12.2023) bearing order passed by respondent/department is stayed till the next date of hearing.

The AGA directed secure instructions and made his submission as to how multiple show-cause notices could have been issued for the same by different officers of the respondent as also how multiple orders could be passed for the very same as regards the very same assessee. As also to ascertain and make a submission if there is any system which has been implemented by the respondents to obviate the above situation.

The court while listing the matter on 20-08-2025 sought the response from department how multiple SCNs could have been issued by different officers as also how multiple orders could be passed for the very same FY as regards the very same assessee. The response if there is any system which has been implemented by the dept. to obviate the situation.

Case Details

Case Title: M/S A.M.S. Enterprises Versus The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes

Case No.: WP/0020841/2025

Date:  23-07-2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Full Enhanced Land Compensation Must Be Deposited; Landowners Can Withdraw 8.33% Pending Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Meerut Development Authority to deposit the entire enhanced...

GST Appeal Can Proceed After Delayed Payment of Admitted Dues; Filing Date Shifts to Full Compliance: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has allowed...

Credit Notes Reported As ITC Can’t Sustain ₹9.56 Lakh GST Demand Where No Tax Was Lost: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bengaluru Bench, has set aside a...

Creditor Facing 99.28% Insolvency Haircut Can Set Off Entire ₹12.26 Crore Claim Against Recovery Demand: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an operational creditor whose claim was settled at...

More like this

Full Enhanced Land Compensation Must Be Deposited; Landowners Can Withdraw 8.33% Pending Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Meerut Development Authority to deposit the entire enhanced...

GST Appeal Can Proceed After Delayed Payment of Admitted Dues; Filing Date Shifts to Full Compliance: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has allowed...

Credit Notes Reported As ITC Can’t Sustain ₹9.56 Lakh GST Demand Where No Tax Was Lost: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Bengaluru Bench, has set aside a...