Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo Show Cause Notice, No Hearing: Delhi High Court Quashes Detention of...

No Show Cause Notice, No Hearing: Delhi High Court Quashes Detention of Passenger’s Gold Ornaments 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has quashed the detention of a passenger’s gold jewellery at IGI Airport, ruling that the customs department failed to issue a proper Show Cause Notice (SCN) or provide a personal hearing before seizing the items.

The Bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta observed that the detention was “no longer tenable.” Referring to its earlier judgment in Amit Kumar v. The Commissioner of Customs, the Court noted that “waivers obtained on printed standard forms” are not valid and violate the principle of natural justice.

The petitioner had sought the release of one gold kada (100 grams) and a gold chain (75 grams), which were seized by Customs officials upon his arrival at Indira Gandhi International Airport on March 19, 2024. The seizure was formalized through a detention receipt dated March 19, 2024, later re-acknowledged on August 8, 2024.

The Customs Department argued that a personal hearing notice had been sent to the petitioner in line with the High Court’s March 27, 2025 ruling in Qamar Jahan v. Union of India & Ors., which mandated that even if a passenger waives the SCN, they must be given an opportunity for a personal hearing.

“The person affected cannot be condemned unheard,” the Court remarked, emphasizing that a valid SCN must be a consciously signed declaration and not a blanket printed form. The Court was particularly critical of Customs’ use of such documents, stating it “shocks the conscience” when passengers are left to “run from pillar to post” to recover their belongings.

The Court further observed that no Order-in-Original had been passed and that the personal hearing notice had been issued more than a year after the original seizure, rendering the entire process procedurally flawed.

The High Court ordered the Customs Department to release the petitioner’s detained goods within four weeks, subject to payment of applicable warehousing charges calculated from the date of detention.

Case Details

Case Title: Nitish Kharbanda Versus Customs Commissioner

Case No.: W.P.(C) 8217/2025

Date:  23rd July, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Richa Kumari

Counsel For Respondent: Aditya Singla

Read More: Delhi High Court Directs CESTAT to Hear Rs. 1.59 Crore Customs Dispute Despite 273-Day Delay Subject To Rs. 50K Cost

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No 10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit for Appeal Against Pre-October 2025 Notice: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has directed the GST appellate authority to consider an appeal...

Is Audit Compulsory for Every Organisation in India? Rules for Companies, LLPs, Businesses and Trusts Explained

An audit is compulsory in India when a law governing the organisation requires it,...

GST on UPI MDR Will Not Affect Most Small Merchants, Says NPCI

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has sought to address concerns that GST...

Kabul-Bound Passenger Stopped at Delhi Airport With 11 Jars of Sandalwood; Customs Begins Probe

The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) stopped an Afghan national at Indira Gandhi International...

More like this

No 10% GST Penalty Pre-Deposit for Appeal Against Pre-October 2025 Notice: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has directed the GST appellate authority to consider an appeal...

Is Audit Compulsory for Every Organisation in India? Rules for Companies, LLPs, Businesses and Trusts Explained

An audit is compulsory in India when a law governing the organisation requires it,...

GST on UPI MDR Will Not Affect Most Small Merchants, Says NPCI

The National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has sought to address concerns that GST...