HomeNotificationCustoms Refunds Without Prior Bill of Entry Re-Assessment to Be Treated as...

Customs Refunds Without Prior Bill of Entry Re-Assessment to Be Treated as Incomplete: JNCH 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House (JNCH) has reiterated that re-assessment of the Bill of Entry is a mandatory pre-condition for claiming refunds of excess Customs duty, directing importers, exporters, customs brokers, and other stakeholders to file such claims exclusively through the “Re-assessment cum Refund” module on the ICEGATE 2.0 Portal.

The Public Notice reinforces the legal position laid down by the Supreme Court and aligns with the automation framework introduced by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) for processing Customs refunds electronically.

Buy Now: Study Material Combo For Customs Brokers Licensing Examination (CBLR) 2026

Re-Assessment Mandatory Before Seeking Refund

The Public Notice refers to earlier Standing Orders, CBIC Circular No. 05/2025-Customs dated February 17, 2025, and Public Notice No. 26/2025, emphasizing that wherever refund of excess Customs duty arises due to an incorrect assessment of a Bill of Entry, the importer must first obtain re-assessment or amendment of the Bill of Entry before filing the refund application.

The Customs administration has clarified that this requirement flows directly from the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in M/s ITC Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-IV Judgment, which held that a refund claim cannot be entertained without first challenging or getting the assessment modified through the prescribed legal mechanism.

ICEGATE 2.0 Introduces Integrated Re-Assessment and Refund Facility

To simplify the process, the Public Notice highlights that an integrated “Re-assessment cum Refund” functionality has been made available on the ICEGATE 2.0 Portal.

The module can be accessed through:

Services → Re-assessment-cum-Refund → Re-assessment-cum-Refund

The integrated system enables applicants to complete both re-assessment and refund filing through a single electronic workflow, significantly reducing manual intervention and ensuring seamless processing.

Step-by-Step Workflow

Under the newly emphasized procedure:

  • The importer or applicant must first submit an electronic request for re-assessment of the Bill of Entry through ICEGATE 2.0.
  • The concerned Appraising Group at JNCH will examine and process the re-assessment request.
  • Once the Bill of Entry is re-assessed or amended, the system will automatically generate a pre-filled refund application for the applicant.
  • After submission of the pre-filled refund application, it will be electronically transmitted to the Centralized Refund Cell (CRC), JNCH.
  • The refund claim will thereafter be processed electronically, with payment being disbursed through the Public Financial Management System (PFMS).

Refund Applications Without Re-Assessment Will Be Considered Incomplete

The Public Notice makes it clear that refund applications filed without obtaining prior re-assessment, wherever such re-assessment is legally required, will not be treated as valid refund applications.

Instead, Customs authorities will issue a deficiency memo, requiring the applicant to first complete the re-assessment process before the refund claim can be processed.

This clarification is particularly important because an incomplete refund application can delay not only the refund itself but also the commencement of the statutory timeline for payment of interest.

Impact on Interest Under Section 27A

The notice also reminds stakeholders of the provisions of Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962.

Under the Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995, a refund application is deemed to have been received only when a complete application is filed and acknowledged by the proper officer.

Consequently, if an applicant files a refund claim without first obtaining mandatory re-assessment, the application will remain incomplete, and the statutory period for calculating interest on delayed refunds under Section 27A will begin only after the deficiencies are rectified and a complete application is submitted.

CBIC’s Refund Automation Initiative

The Public Notice also draws attention to CBIC Circular No. 05/2025-Customs, which introduced automation of Customs refund processing. The Circular specifically provides that where re-assessment is necessary, applicants must first seek re-assessment through ICEGATE. Upon completion of that process, the portal automatically generates a pre-filled refund application, thereby integrating both stages into a single electronic workflow.

Advisory to Trade

JNCH has advised all importers, exporters, customs brokers, and other stakeholders to invariably use the “Re-assessment cum Refund” module on ICEGATE 2.0 for all refund claims that require amendment or re-assessment of the Bill of Entry.

The Customs administration has further stated that any implementation-related difficulties may be brought to the notice of the Joint or Additional Commissioner of Customs in charge of the Centralized Refund Cell, JNCH, NS-III.

The latest Public Notice reinforces the Customs Department’s move towards a fully digital refund ecosystem while ensuring strict compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling that re-assessment remains the essential legal foundation for claiming refunds of excess Customs duty.

Membership Required to Access Notification Details & Copy

To view the complete Notification Details and Download Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Uncorroborated Statements, Denial of Cross-Examination Can’t Sustain Customs Action: CESTAT Quashes Gold Jewellery Confiscation

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Parallel Investigation By CGST & SGST Dept. Challenge Fails: Karnataka HC Upholds DGGI Criminal Proceedings

The Karnataka High Court has rejected a challenge to criminal proceedings initiated by the...

851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Tax Appeal

The Madras High Court has set aside an order of the Income Tax Appellate...

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the Input Tax Credit (GST ITC) cannot...

ITR AY 2026-27: How to Report Share Buyback Proceeds After New Tax Rules?

The filing of Income Tax Returns (ITRs) for Assessment Year (AY) 2026-27 has brought...

More like this

Parallel Investigation By CGST & SGST Dept. Challenge Fails: Karnataka HC Upholds DGGI Criminal Proceedings

The Karnataka High Court has rejected a challenge to criminal proceedings initiated by the...

851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Tax Appeal

The Madras High Court has set aside an order of the Income Tax Appellate...

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held that the Input Tax Credit (GST ITC) cannot...