Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala...

GST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the Input Tax Credit (GST ITC) cannot be denied if returns meet the deadline under Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.

The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has directed tax authorities to reconsider the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the assessee, a Thrissur-based manufacturing firm, holding that the company may be entitled to the benefit under the amended provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act.

The petition was filed by assessee against an assessment order that had rejected its claim for ITC for the period between November 2018 and March 2019. The assessment order had concluded that the company was ineligible because it had not filed its GST returns within the deadline prescribed under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

The petitioner/assessee is a registered GST taxpayer based in Porkulam, Thrissur district, challenged the assessment order issued by the State GST authorities. The company argued that while its returns were indeed filed after the original statutory deadline, they were submitted well before the extended deadline introduced through Section 16(5) of the CGST Act following legislative amendments.

The disputed returns were filed on the following dates: November 2018 return – October 29, 2019; December 2018 return – November 18, 2019; January 2019 return – November 25, 2019; February 2019 return – December 27, 2019; and March 2019 return – January 4, 2020.

These filings, the petitioner argued, fell comfortably within the cut-off date of November 30, 2021, prescribed under Section 16(5), making the company eligible to claim the corresponding input tax credit.

After reviewing the assessment order and the statutory provisions, the High Court observed that the returns in question had indeed been filed before the extended deadline contemplated under Section 16(5).

The Court noted that the assessment order itself acknowledged the dates on which the returns were filed. Since all the returns had been submitted well before November 30, 2021, the Court found that the tax authorities had failed to properly apply the amended legal provision while rejecting the ITC claim.

The High Court partially quashed the assessment order insofar as it denied the input tax credit for the disputed months. Instead of directly granting the credit, the Court directed the State Tax Officer to reconsider the matter and extend the benefit of input tax credit if the petitioner satisfies all other statutory requirements.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: ITR AY 2026-27: How to Report Share Buyback Proceeds After New Tax Rules?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GSTN Introduces Auto-Population Facility for Additional GST Registrations Under Same PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a new auto-population facility to...

CGST Dept. Can’t Start Parallel Proceedings After State Officer Acts on Same Matter: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the Central GST authorities cannot initiate parallel...

Customs Refund Can’t Be Adjusted Against Disputed Demand That Has Not Attained Finality: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has directed the Customs...

Income Tax Reassessment Can’t Revisit Issues Examined During Scrutiny Merely Because Original Order Is Silent: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against a taxpayer for Assessment...

More like this

GSTN Introduces Auto-Population Facility for Additional GST Registrations Under Same PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a new auto-population facility to...

CGST Dept. Can’t Start Parallel Proceedings After State Officer Acts on Same Matter: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the Central GST authorities cannot initiate parallel...

Customs Refund Can’t Be Adjusted Against Disputed Demand That Has Not Attained Finality: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has directed the Customs...