HomeDirect Tax851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting...

851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Tax Appeal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has set aside an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that dismissed an appeal solely on account of an 851-day delay in filing.

The Bench of Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice N. Mala allowed the writ petition directing the ITAT to hear the appeal on merits and dispose of it in accordance with law within twelve weeks.

The dispute arose after the ITAT refused to condone an 851-day delay in filing the company’s appeal relating to the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal had concluded that the taxpayer had failed to satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay and consequently dismissed the appeal without examining the merits of the case.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

Before the High Court, the petitioner argued that the appellate order had not been communicated directly to the company. Instead, it had been sent to the email address of its former Chartered Accountant, who allegedly failed to inform the company about the order. As a result, the company remained unaware of the decision, leading to the substantial delay in approaching the ITAT.

After examining the material placed on record, the Bench observed that the appellate order had indeed been sent to the email address of the Chartered Accountant and not communicated directly to the assessee. The Court held that this constituted a probable explanation for the delay.

More importantly, the Bench emphasized that once an appeal had been filed, the Tribunal ought to have considered the matter on its merits instead of rejecting it purely on the ground of delay.

The High Court quashed the ITAT’s order dated March 18, 2026, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication.

The Court directed the ITAT to hear the appeal on merits, in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the High Court’s judgment. The writ petition was disposed of without any order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...