Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect Tax851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting...

851-Day Delay No Bar to Justice: Madras HC Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Tax Appeal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has set aside an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that dismissed an appeal solely on account of an 851-day delay in filing.

The Bench of Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice N. Mala allowed the writ petition directing the ITAT to hear the appeal on merits and dispose of it in accordance with law within twelve weeks.

The dispute arose after the ITAT refused to condone an 851-day delay in filing the company’s appeal relating to the Assessment Year 2014-15. The Tribunal had concluded that the taxpayer had failed to satisfactorily explain the inordinate delay and consequently dismissed the appeal without examining the merits of the case.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – June 2026

Before the High Court, the petitioner argued that the appellate order had not been communicated directly to the company. Instead, it had been sent to the email address of its former Chartered Accountant, who allegedly failed to inform the company about the order. As a result, the company remained unaware of the decision, leading to the substantial delay in approaching the ITAT.

After examining the material placed on record, the Bench observed that the appellate order had indeed been sent to the email address of the Chartered Accountant and not communicated directly to the assessee. The Court held that this constituted a probable explanation for the delay.

More importantly, the Bench emphasized that once an appeal had been filed, the Tribunal ought to have considered the matter on its merits instead of rejecting it purely on the ground of delay.

The High Court quashed the ITAT’s order dated March 18, 2026, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication.

The Court directed the ITAT to hear the appeal on merits, in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the High Court’s judgment. The writ petition was disposed of without any order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GST ITC Can’t Be Denied If Returns Meet S. 16(5) Deadline: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Courier Can’t Be Penalised for Narcotics Ingeniously Concealed in Export Garments Without Proof of Knowledge: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

DGGI Hyderabad | GST Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Dept. Plans Appeal: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has ruled that a GST refund arising from an appellate...

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on Difference Between Balance Sheet and ST-3 Returns: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that a...

More like this

Courier Can’t Be Penalised for Narcotics Ingeniously Concealed in Export Garments Without Proof of Knowledge: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

DGGI Hyderabad | GST Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Dept. Plans Appeal: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has ruled that a GST refund arising from an appellate...

Profit From Purchase and Sale of Cargo Space Not Taxable as Business Auxiliary Service: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...