HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 07 JULY, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 07 JULY, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 07, 2026.

GST

  1. WHAT HAPPENS TO GST OFFICERS CAUGHT TAKING BRIBES?
  2. TELANGANA HIGH COURT RESTORES GST APPEAL WITHDRAWN DUE TO ALLEGED FILING ERROR
  3. DGGI KOLKATA | CALCUTTA HIGH COURT STAYS GST ASSESSMENT ORDER OVER ALLEGED VIOLATION OF NATURAL JUSTICE IN DRC-01 PROCEEDINGS
  4. CAN GST DEMANDS ORDERS BE QUASHED IF ISSUED BY AN OFFICER LACKING MONETARY JURISDICTION?
  5. S. 122(1A) CAN’T BE INVOKED AGAINST INDIVIDUAL WHO COULDN’T HAVE RETAINED BENEFIT OF TRANSACTION: BOMBAY HC STAYS RECOVERY 
  6. GST SCN BEYOND LIMITATION INVALID; PARALLEL CGST PROCEEDINGS ON SAME ITC ISSUE BARRED: TRIPURA HC

Service Tax

  1. CONTRACTS EXECUTED BY SUB-CONTRACTORS WERE WORKS CONTRACTS AND NOT MANPOWER SUPPLY SERVICES, SERVICE TAX DEMAND UNDER RCM UNSUSTAINABLE: CESTAT

Customs Duty

  1. THAILAND CUSTOMS DEPLOYS AI, K-9 UNITS AND ADVANCED SCREENING TO CRACK DOWN ON DRUG TRAFFICKING THROUGH AIRPORTS AND CARGO NETWORKS
  2. PROTOTYPE VEHICLES MUST BE VALUED ON COMPARABLE GOODS BASIS, CESTAT REJECTS 110% COST VALUATION DEMAND
  3. CLANDESTINE REMOVAL CAN’T BE PROVEN SOLELY THROUGH PEN DRIVES: CESTAT QUASHES RS. 1 CRORE+ EXCISE DUTY DEMAND
  4. CESTAT QUASHES CONFISCATION OF 2.68 LAKH GRAMS OF DUTY-FREE GOLD, SETS ASIDE RS. 50 LAKH REDEMPTION FINE
  5. EXOTIC BIRDS, MAMMALS NOT GOODS UNDER S. 123 OF CUSTOMS ACT, 1962: CESTAT ORDERS RELEASE OF SEIZED EXOTIC BIRDS
  6. DELAY BY CUSTOMS OFFICER CAN’T DEFEAT GENUINE EXPORT: CESTAT
  7. CUSTOMS DEPT. CAN’T REJECT IGST REFUND SOLELY BECAUSE EXPORTER CLAIMED HIGHER DUTY DRAWBACK RATE: MADRAS HC

Excise Duty

  1. ED FILES PMLA PROSECUTION COMPLAINT AGAINST FORMER MADHYA PRADESH EXCISE OFFICER IN ₹18.20 CRORE DISPROPORTIONATE ASSETS CASE

Income Tax

  1. CHENNAI TAXPAYER SENTENCED TO 1 YEAR RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT FOR WILFUL NON-FILING OF INCOME TAX RETURN
  2. APPELLATE AUTHORITY CAN’T ADMIT NEW TAX EVIDENCE WITHOUT FOLLOWING RULE 46A: J&K HIGH COURT
  3. APPELLATE AUTHORITY CAN’T ADMIT NEW TAX EVIDENCE WITHOUT FOLLOWING RULE 46A: J&K HIGH COURT
  4. CORPORATE RETURNS WITH INCOME EXCEEDING RS. 30 LAKH IN METRO CITIES TO BE HANDLED BY ACIT OR DCIT, NOT BY ITO: ITAT
  5. ITAT ALLOWS FULL DEDUCTION OF DEBENTURE DISCOUNT
  6. PCIT CAN’T INVOKE S. 263 MERELY DUE TO DIFFERENT VIEW ON SURVEY DISCLOSURE IN LIMITED SCRUTINY ASSESSMENT: GUJARAT HIGH COURT
  7. S. 263 CAN’T BE INVOKED WHERE AO ADOPTED A PLAUSIBLE VIEW AFTER INQUIRY: ITAT
  8. GIFT TO PARENTS IS TAX-FREE, BUT DON’T IGNORE THESE INCOME TAX COMPLIANCES
  9. INCOME TAX DEPT. TO CONDONE DELAY, PROCESS RETURN AND REFUND CLAIM OF 91-YEAR-OLD NRI: MADRAS HIGH COURT 
  10. SENIOR CITIZEN SAVINGS SCHEME GETS 5 KEY RULE CHANGES FROM JULY 1, 2026

Corporate Law

  1. COMPANY’S SOLE UNDERTAKING CAN’T BE ENDED THROUGH OPPRESSIVE PROCESS: NCLT QUASHES EOGM RESOLUTION TERMINATING JVA

Others

  1. ICAI DISMISSES SOCIAL MEDIA CLAIMS OF STUDENT AND EXAMINATION DATA BREACH, CALLS THEM “FALSE”
  2. COMMERCIAL TAX DEPT’S STATUTORY FIRST CHARGE PREVAILS OVER SECURED CREDITOR’S SARFAESI CLAIM: KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 
  3. BANKS CAN’T BLACKLIST LAWYERS FOR NEGLIGENCE THROUGH IBA CAUTION LIST: SUPREME COURT
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

A Special Court in Mumbai has granted bail to a jeweller accused of criminal...

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...