Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsCryptocurrency Fraud: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against ‘ZOOM BABA’...

Cryptocurrency Fraud: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against ‘ZOOM BABA’ For Inducing Public To Invest In Ruby Coin

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has refused to quash FIR against ‘ZOOM BABA’ for inducing the public to invest in crypto currency named Ruby Coin.

The bench of Justice Sangeeta Chandra and Justice Brij Raj Singh has observed that the petitioner, Mahendra Pratap Srivastava was one of the Board member of the Elite Club and he along with the main accused had induced innocent public to invest in virtual currency (Crypto Currency) by the name of Ruby Coin. 

The bench noted that the petitioner used to hold ‘Zoom’ meetings with intending investors to induce them into buying such Ruby Coin/Crypto Currency and other Board members used to call him “Zoom Baba” because of his expertise in inducing the innocent investors into investing in such Crypto Currency.

The petitioner was contractually engaged as one of the trainers for educating the members of Ruby Coin Community with regard to Block Chain and Crypto Currency and the petitioner was not involved in any financial transactions and also the allegations made in the F.I.R. do not show the involvement of the petitioner. 

The petitioner contended that he was also not involved in the development of software and he has no knowledge of any financial fraud or cheating having been done by Samir Keshari, the main accused. Moreover, the petitioner had tendered his resignation to Samir Keshari way back on 31.10.2023 as he was unable to train the members due to personal difficulty and health issues.

The court while dismissing the petition held that a cognizable offence has been made out against the petitioner. There is no good ground to interfere in the F.I.R.

Case Details

Case Title: Mahendra Pratap Srivastava Versus State of UP

Case No.: Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. – 1312 Of 2025

Date: 14.2.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Amol Kumar Srivastava

Counsel For Respondent: G.A.

Read More: Filing Of Bogus Certificates And Notices: Andhra Pradesh High Court Uphold Rejection Of Application Under SVLDRS

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Land Advances Recorded in Books Can Be Taxed as Unexplained Cash Credits If Source Is Not Proven: ITAT

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld an addition...

Land Sale Taxable As Capital Gains, REIT Dividend Exempt Where SPVs Did Not Opt For Concessional Tax Regime: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Share Purchase Advance Shown As Unsecured Loan Doesn’t Automatically Become Financial Debt: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...

Income Tax Reassessment Based On Political Party Search Can’t Be Extended By Inapplicable Notice Procedure: ITAT

The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a reassessment...

More like this

Land Advances Recorded in Books Can Be Taxed as Unexplained Cash Credits If Source Is Not Proven: ITAT

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld an addition...

Land Sale Taxable As Capital Gains, REIT Dividend Exempt Where SPVs Did Not Opt For Concessional Tax Regime: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Share Purchase Advance Shown As Unsecured Loan Doesn’t Automatically Become Financial Debt: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has held that...