HomeNotificationGovt Reveals Details of Corporate Tax Rate Cuts and Revenue Losses

Govt Reveals Details of Corporate Tax Rate Cuts and Revenue Losses

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has disclosed detailed information in the Rajya Sabha regarding corporate tax rate reductions carried out since 2014, along with their rationale and the revenue impact on the exchequer. 

Responding to an un-starred question by MP Raghav Chadha, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary highlighted a series of corporate tax cuts introduced through successive Finance Acts.

The government stated that these tax rate reductions were aimed at promoting growth, boosting investment, creating jobs, and making Indian companies globally competitive. The key reductions included:

  • 2016: Corporate tax reduced to 29% to stimulate growth and employment.
  • 2017: Corporate tax cut to 25% for smaller domestic companies with annual turnover up to ₹50 crore.
  • 2019 (Taxation Laws Amendment Act): Introduction of concessional rates under Sections 115BAA (22% for domestic companies) and 115BAB (15% for new manufacturing firms).
  • 2024 (Finance Act No. 2): Reduction in foreign company tax rates from 40% to 35% to attract more investment.

Revenue Forgone

The government also shared the estimated revenue forgone due to these corporate tax cuts:

  • 2019-20: ₹8,043 crore
  • 2020-21: ₹75,218 crore
  • 2021-22: ₹96,892 crore
  • 2022-23: ₹88,109 crore
  • 2023-24 (projected): ₹98,999 crore

Data for the current financial year (2024-25) is not yet available.

No Impact Assessment Conducted

The government admitted that it has not conducted any impact assessment to evaluate whether these tax cuts have effectively boosted private investment, economic growth, or employment generation. As a result, questions regarding findings on the effectiveness of the tax cuts “do not arise,” the ministry stated.

The disclosure comes amid ongoing debates over the fiscal implications of corporate tax reductions and whether they have translated into tangible economic benefits.

Read More: Centre Clears GST Compensation Dues; Only Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur Pending

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 11, 2026.GSTDGGI OFFICERS CAN’T SEIZE CASH...

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order Granting Limited Interim Protection in Oppression–Mismanagement Dispute

The Supreme Court of India has upheld an order of the National Company Law...

Parties Can’t Challenge Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution After Acquiescence: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a party cannot belatedly challenge the constitution of...

Procedural Lapse U/s 157 CrPC Not Fatal to Prosecution: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction and life sentence of 4 men in...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : MARCH 11, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for March 11, 2026.GSTDGGI OFFICERS CAN’T SEIZE CASH...

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order Granting Limited Interim Protection in Oppression–Mismanagement Dispute

The Supreme Court of India has upheld an order of the National Company Law...

Parties Can’t Challenge Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution After Acquiescence: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a party cannot belatedly challenge the constitution of...