HomeNotificationCBIC Seeks Inputs on Legality of “Bunched” GST SCN Covering Multiple FYs...

CBIC Seeks Inputs on Legality of “Bunched” GST SCN Covering Multiple FYs [READ CIRCULAR]

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has invited comments from its field formations on the legality of issuing consolidated or “bunched” Show Cause Notices (SCNs) covering multiple financial years under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime.  The request follows a rising number of writ petitions filed across High Courts challenging the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Customs Dept. Can’t Reject Declared Import Value Solely on Directorate of Valuation Guidelines Without Evidence: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Deletion of Phrase from Input Service Definition Doesn’t Bar Credit: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Factory ‘Setting Up’ Services

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Running Account Bills Containing Substantial Statutory Particulars Cannot Be Rejected for CENVAT Credit on Technical Grounds: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Manufacturers Can’t Claim Proportionate Cess Relief for Machines Installed During the Month: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has upheld the validity of Rule 12(4) of the Health...

More like this

Customs Dept. Can’t Reject Declared Import Value Solely on Directorate of Valuation Guidelines Without Evidence: CESTAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Deletion of Phrase from Input Service Definition Doesn’t Bar Credit: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Factory ‘Setting Up’ Services

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Running Account Bills Containing Substantial Statutory Particulars Cannot Be Rejected for CENVAT Credit on Technical Grounds: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...