HomeNotificationCBI Charges Its Own DySP For Allegedly Accepting Rs. 20 Lakh Bribe...

CBI Charges Its Own DySP For Allegedly Accepting Rs. 20 Lakh Bribe In Customs Corruption Probe

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has charged its own officer who was the  deputy superintendent of police (DySP) named A. Bhaskar, for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs. 20 lakh  from a customs official during a customs corruption probe.

In March 2023, Bhaskar assigned a case wherein the complaint alleged that a group, including customs officers and clearing agents, was involved in clearing goods without paying the required customs duty. The scheme reportedly used the passports of individuals who had lived abroad for over two years.

The accused customs officers had formed a cartel that received illegal gratification and allowed these dutiable goods without charging customs duty on them.

DSP Bhaskar, while investigating the case against customs officers, is alleged to have taken undue advantage and accepted a bribe. Customs Preventive Officer Roshan Kumar, Assistant Commissioner Yogesh Kumar, and private individual Vijay Mawara are accused of facilitating the conspiracy and its execution.

Read More: Maharashtra Customs Commissioner Enables Voluntary Payment Electronically On ICEGATE e-Payment Platform

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

3 Month Timeline U/s 121 IBC Is Directory, Delay in Bankruptcy Petition Against Personal Guarantor Can Be Condoned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the three-month period prescribed...

NCLT Can’t Interfere with ED’s PMLA Attachments During CIRP: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, has held that the National...

Holding Company Can’t Issue Shares on Behalf of Subsidiary to Claim S. 72A Demerger Tax Benefits: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...

TDS on Coaching Faculty Remains U/s 194J, Not Salary Provision U/s 192: ITAT

The Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that remuneration...

More like this

3 Month Timeline U/s 121 IBC Is Directory, Delay in Bankruptcy Petition Against Personal Guarantor Can Be Condoned: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the three-month period prescribed...

NCLT Can’t Interfere with ED’s PMLA Attachments During CIRP: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, has held that the National...

Holding Company Can’t Issue Shares on Behalf of Subsidiary to Claim S. 72A Demerger Tax Benefits: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...