Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationSupreme Court Designates 4 Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates

Supreme Court Designates 4 Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant decision aimed at recognising judicial excellence and experience, the Supreme Court of India has designated four former Chief Justices and Judges of various High Courts as Senior Advocates. The announcement was made following a Full Court Meeting held on 10 December 2025, presided over by the Chief Justice of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court.

The designation—considered one of the highest honours in the legal profession—has been conferred with effect from 10 December 2025. Those elevated include:

  1. Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili, Former Judge, High Court for the State of Telangana
  2. Justice Pavankumar B. Bajenthri, Former Chief Justice, High Court of Judicature at Patna
  3. Justice Satyendra Singh Chauhan, Former Judge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. Justice T.S. Sivagnanam, Former Chief Justice, High Court at Calcutta

The decision underscores the Supreme Court’s continued commitment to recognising distinguished contributions made by members of the higher judiciary, even after their retirement from judicial office. Senior Advocate designation is granted to advocates with exceptional ability, standing at the Bar, and special knowledge or experience in law.

The notification was issued by Devender Pal Walia, Registrar (CDSA), formalising the appointments.

This move is expected to further strengthen the Bar with the rich judicial expertise of the designated former judges, who will now be able to appear and argue cases before various courts and tribunals as Senior Advocates.

Read More: Can Confiscation Under S. 130 Be Invoked Straight From S. 129 Detention? Gujarat HC Answers

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Service Tax Refund on Cancelled Flat Booking Cannot Be Rejected as Time-Barred: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of  Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 24, 2026.GSTNO 10% GST PENALTY PRE-DEPOSIT...

Training Call Letter Is Not Appointment Order: Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Railway Protection Special Force Rakshak

The Supreme Court has held that a letter calling a selected candidate for mandatory...

Sessions Court Can’t Bar Remission for Entire Life in Murder Case: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Sessions Court sentencing a person for murder...

More like this

Service Tax Refund on Cancelled Flat Booking Cannot Be Rejected as Time-Barred: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of  Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 24, 2026.GSTNO 10% GST PENALTY PRE-DEPOSIT...

Training Call Letter Is Not Appointment Order: Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Railway Protection Special Force Rakshak

The Supreme Court has held that a letter calling a selected candidate for mandatory...