HomeInternational TaxationTrump Clarifies: No Additional Tariffs on Gold Imports Amid Global Market Jitters

Trump Clarifies: No Additional Tariffs on Gold Imports Amid Global Market Jitters

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

US President Donald Trump on Monday assured that gold imports will remain free from additional tariffs, easing concerns that had rattled global bullion markets last week.

“Gold will not be Tariffed!” Trump declared on his Truth Social account, without elaborating. His statement followed days of uncertainty triggered by a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) letter that appeared to classify certain gold bars under tariffed goods.

The letter, dated July 31 and first reported by the Financial Times, indicated that gold bars weighing one kilogram and 100 ounces (2.8 kg) should be subject to duties. This move surprised traders, as such products were widely expected to fall under a different customs classification exempt from Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs on imports from dozens of countries — including Switzerland, which faces a 39% levy.

The classification scare sent shockwaves through the market, with December gold futures on the Comex exchange hitting a record high on Friday. One-kilogram bars, the primary unit traded on Comex, also represent the bulk of Switzerland’s gold exports to the US.

A White House official told AFP last week that the administration plans to issue an executive order to “clarify misinformation” surrounding the tariff status of gold bars and other specialty items.

Gold prices have been climbing throughout the year amid geopolitical tensions and trade policy uncertainty, cementing its position as a safe-haven asset for investors. The latest tariff confusion briefly amplified those gains before Trump’s assurance calmed market nerves.

Read More: CESTAT Strikes Down Most Service Tax Demands on Hospital Services, Upholds Levy on Overseas Patient Referral Commissions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

SAD Refund Limitation to Be Counted from Date of Domestic Sale And Not From The Date of Import: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that the Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund limitation...

Titan Challenges Deemed Supply Provision Under GST: Madras High Court to Examine Taxability of Unreturned Job Work Inputs

In a significant development for the manufacturing and GST ecosystem, Titan Company Limited has...

Can Service Tax Be Demanded Solely on Form 26AS Data Without Pre-SCN Consultation? Gauhati High Court Remand Back Matter to CESTAT

The Gauhati High Court while remanding the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service...

Amended Formula U/R 89 (5) For Inverted Duty Refunds Is Retrospectively Applicable: Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that the amended formula under Rule 89...

More like this

SAD Refund Limitation to Be Counted from Date of Domestic Sale And Not From The Date of Import: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has reiterated that the Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund limitation...

Titan Challenges Deemed Supply Provision Under GST: Madras High Court to Examine Taxability of Unreturned Job Work Inputs

In a significant development for the manufacturing and GST ecosystem, Titan Company Limited has...

Can Service Tax Be Demanded Solely on Form 26AS Data Without Pre-SCN Consultation? Gauhati High Court Remand Back Matter to CESTAT

The Gauhati High Court while remanding the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service...