Gold Worth Rs. 1.22 Crore Seized At Trichy Airport

HomeIndirect TaxesGold Worth Rs. 1.22 Crore Seized At Trichy Airport

Gold Worth Rs. 1.22 Crore Seized At Trichy Airport

Indirect Taxes

Published on

01/03/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Gold Worth Rs. 1.22 Crore Seized At Trichy Airport

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Gold worth ₹1.22 crore was seized at Trichy Airport by officers of the Customs Intelligence Unit (CIU), Trichy Customs.

Acting on specific intelligence, officers of the Customs Intelligence Unit (CIU), Trichy Customs, seized 1.395 kg of gold valued at ₹1,22,76,000 at Trichy International Airport. The gold was concealed inside an ice crusher found in the check-in luggage of a passenger arriving from Sharjah.

Further investigation into the case is underway.

On specific intelligence, Officers of CIU, Trichy Customs seized gold totally weighing 1.395 kg valued at Rs. 1,22,76,000/- at Trichy Airport on 27.02.2025 concealed in an ice crusher in the check-in luggage of a passenger who arrived from Sharjah. @cbic_india @cusprevtrichy pic.twitter.com/AmzFbVo7b1
— Trichy Customs (Preventive) Commissionerate (@commrprevcustry) February 27, 2025

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Gold Worth Rs. 1.22 Crore Seized At Trichy Airport

Latest articles

Contracts Executed By Sub-Contractors Were Works Contracts And Not Manpower Supply Services, Service Tax Demand Under RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT

Delay by Customs Officer Can’t Defeat Genuine Export: CESTAT

S. 122(1A) Can’t Be Invoked Against Individual Who Couldn’t Have Retained Benefit Of Transaction: Bombay HC Stays Recovery

ED Files PMLA Prosecution Complaint Against Former Madhya Pradesh Excise Officer in ₹18.20 Crore Disproportionate Assets Case

More like this

Contracts Executed By Sub-Contractors Were Works Contracts And Not Manpower Supply Services, Service Tax Demand Under RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT

Delay by Customs Officer Can’t Defeat Genuine Export: CESTAT

S. 122(1A) Can’t Be Invoked Against Individual Who Couldn’t Have Retained Benefit Of Transaction: Bombay HC Stays Recovery

About us

Company

Categories