Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationPresident Promulgates Income Tax Amendment Ordinance, 2026; Exempts FIIs and BIS from...

President Promulgates Income Tax Amendment Ordinance, 2026; Exempts FIIs and BIS from G-Sec Tax Liabilities

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The President of India has promulgated the Income-tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026 (No. 2 of 2026). Published in an extraordinary edition of the Gazette of India today by the Ministry of Law and Justice, the legislative intervention introduces sweeping tax exemptions on interest income and capital gains realized by Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) from investments in Government Securities (G-Secs).

The ordinance, executed under powers vested by Clause (1) of Article 123 of the Constitution, was triggered as Parliament is currently not in session and immediate executive action was deemed necessary. Crucially, the amendment to Schedule IV of the Income-tax Act, 2025 has been granted a retroactive mandate and is deemed to have come into force on April 1, 2026, capturing the start of the current financial year.

Structural Shift in Sovereign Bond Taxation

The ordinance introduces two major entries to the statutory framework under Schedule IV of the Act:

  1. Serial Number 13D (Foreign Institutional Investors): Exempts any interest on Government securities and any capital gains arising from the sale, exchange, or transfer of such securities.
  2. Serial Number 13E (Bank for International Settlements): Extends identical exemptions to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

The statutory notes explicitly clarify the definition of the BIS as the historic global financial institution established at the Hague Conference in 1930 and headquartered in Basel, Switzerland.

Transparency and Regulatory Compliance

While the move dramatically cuts down the tax dragnet for cross-border institutional capital, it comes with explicit regulatory riders. The ordinance specifies that the exemptions shall be strictly “subject to furnishing of information in such form and manner, as may be prescribed”. This ensures that while capital entry is financially incentivized, the government retains absolute oversight and transactional transparency regarding institutional beneficiaries.

Market analysts view this dynamic tax shift as a strategic move to optimize India’s positioning on global bond indices, making domestic sovereign debt significantly more lucrative to international central banks and elite asset managers. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is expected to roll out the operational guidelines and structural reporting templates for foreign investors shortly.

Read More: ITR Filing 2026: Which Income Tax Return Form Is Right for You?

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...