Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDRI Foils Smuggling Of Chinese Firecrackers Worth Rs. 5.01 crore

DRI Foils Smuggling Of Chinese Firecrackers Worth Rs. 5.01 crore

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a proactive crackdown on the illegal import of firecrackers ahead of Deepawali, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), as part of its ongoing ‘Operation Fire Trail’, intercepted two 40-foot containers at Tuticorin Port. 

The containers, falsely declared as carrying engineering goods, were found to conceal 83,520 pieces of Chinese firecrackers valued at Rs. 5.01 crore. The consignment, along with its cover cargo of silicon sealant guns, has been seized.

Between 14th and 18th October 2025, DRI officers conducted coordinated operations across Tuticorin and Chennai, apprehending the importer at Tuticorin and subsequently arresting three others — including two individuals from Mumbai — for their involvement in the smuggling network. All four accused have been remanded to judicial custody.

The import of firecrackers is restricted under the ITC (HS) Classification of the Foreign Trade Policy and requires authorisation from both the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO) under the Explosives Rules, 2008. The mis-declaration and illicit import not only breach trade and safety regulations but also endanger public safety and port infrastructure given the highly combustible nature of firecrackers.

The DRI reaffirmed its commitment to combating smuggling, safeguarding national assets, and ensuring public safety.

Read More: Is Live Reporting In Court Becoming Hindrance In Justice And Leading To Miscommunication?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...