Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesClandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged on Assumptions Alone: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 50...

Clandestine Removal Cannot Be Alleged on Assumptions Alone: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 50 Lakh Excise Demand

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi has set aside a Central Excise duty demand of over Rs. 50 lakh raised against menthol manufacturer holding that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained merely on presumptions without tangible evidence.  The Bench comprising Justice Ashok Jindal…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against Recovery After Plea That Underlying Order Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has directed that no coercive action be taken against the...
Notification

CBIC Clarifies Rupee Receipts, Set-Offs; Bars Refund Recovery Where AD Bank Writes Off Realisation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that payments for...
GST

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...
GST

GST Demand Can’t Be Confirmed Without SCN; DRC-01 Summary No Substitute: GSTAT Bengaluru

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

More like this

GST

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection Against Recovery After Plea That Underlying Order Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has directed that no coercive action be taken against the...
Notification

CBIC Clarifies Rupee Receipts, Set-Offs; Bars Refund Recovery Where AD Bank Writes Off Realisation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that payments for...
GST

GSTR-1 Duplication Can’t Create Tax Liability Without Second Supply: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...