Tax Officer Can't Pass Final Orders After Granting Adjournment: Kerala High Court
Tax Officer Can’t Pass Final Orders After Granting Adjournment: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court ruled that the Tax Officer can’t pass final orders after granting adjournment.

The bench viewed that there is some merit in the contention taken by the petitioner that after having granted an adjournment for a period of two weeks on the basis of an adjournment request filed on 05.12.2019, the officer could not have proceeded to pass final orders on 17.12.2019 as the period of two weeks would have expired only on 19.12.2019.

The bench stated that even if the contention of the Government Pleader that the adjournment granted was for a period of two weeks from 02.12.2019 is considered, a reading of the order does not indicate that the adjournment granted was for a period of two weeks from 02.12.2019 and on the other hand it appears that the adjournment granted was for a period of two weeks from 05.12.2019. 

Therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, the court allowed the writ petition by setting aside the orders and remitting the proposals for imposition of penalty for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19 to the files of the respondent and permitting the said respondent to pass fresh orders, in accordance with the law. 

Read More: Automation Implementation In Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty or for Specified End Use) Rules, 2022 For EOUs: CBIC

Facts 

The writ petition has been filed challenging orders imposing penalties on the petitioner under Section 74 read with Section 122 (1) of the CGST / SGST Acts, 2017 for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19. 

Case Information 

Case Name: Velplex Industries, Elakamon, Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram V/S The State Tax Officer (Intelligence)

Judicial Level & Location : High Court Of Kerala 

Appeal Number : WP(C) NO. 3946 OF 2020 

Date of Ruling : 17/07/2024

Ruling in favor of: Petitioner 

Judges:   Justice Gopinath P.

Counsel for Petitioner: Adv P.M.Poulose

Counsel for Respondent: Thushara James (Sr. Gp)

Download Judgment

Juris Hour Team
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders Citing Absence Of AO’s Signature And DIN Number 

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has quashed the GST assessment orders citing…

BIG Relief To GST Dept.: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismissed Petition Challenging Single SCN For Multiple AYs Contrary To Other HC Rulings

In a major relief to the GST department, the Madhya Pradesh High…

Govt. Notifies GSTAT Appointing Authority

The Finance Ministry has notified the appointing authority of the Goods and…

One Nation, Too Many Taxes? From Promise to Pending, GST’s 8-Year Journey Marred by GSTAT Delays

GST Day: Despite record collections and digital reforms, GST’s eighth anniversary highlights unresolved issues like stalled tribunals, complex rate structures, and a rising compliance burden on businesses.