CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation After Finding No Proof Of CBLR Violations By Customs Broker

HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation After Finding No Proof Of CBLR Violations By...

CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation After Finding No Proof Of CBLR Violations By Customs Broker

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

12/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation After Finding No Proof Of CBLR Violations By Customs Broker

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has overturned the order revoking a Customs Broker (CB) licence after holding that the Commissioner of Customs failed to substantiate any violation of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. The bench of Justice Mr. Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation After Finding No Proof Of CBLR Violations By Customs Broker

Membership Required

Latest articles

Cadre Change Not Same as Transfer: Supreme Court Directs Reallocation to Uttarakhand, Slams State Apathy After 26-Year Delay

Conviction Can Rest on Sole Injured Eyewitness if Testimony is of ‘Sterling Quality’: Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment

Supreme Court Slams Delay by Tamil Nadu Govt, Vacates Status Quo in Decades-Old Thazhambur Land Dispute; Protects Rights of Innocent Flat Buyers

ITAT Quashes Reassessment for AY 2017–18 Over Invalid Approval U/s 151(ii), Deletes Rs. 10.09 Lakh Addition

More like this

Cadre Change Not Same as Transfer: Supreme Court Directs Reallocation to Uttarakhand, Slams State Apathy After 26-Year Delay

Conviction Can Rest on Sole Injured Eyewitness if Testimony is of ‘Sterling Quality’: Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment

Supreme Court Slams Delay by Tamil Nadu Govt, Vacates Status Quo in Decades-Old Thazhambur Land Dispute; Protects Rights of Innocent Flat Buyers

About us

Company

Categories