HomeGSTSafari Judgement Review Petition Filed By GST Dept. Dismissed: Supreme Court

Safari Judgement Review Petition Filed By GST Dept. Dismissed: Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petition filed by the Goods and Service Tax (GST) department in the case of Safari Retreat.

The bench of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karo has stated, “We have gone through the review petition and perused the Judgment and Order dated 03 October 2024 which has been sought to be reviewed. There is no error apparent on the record.”

The court dismissed the petition.

“Error In Drafting GST Act, 2017” Says CBIC Chairman, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal: 55th GST Council Meet

The CBIC Chairman, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal while addressing Press Conference Of 55th GST Council Meet said, “Error In Drafting GST Act, 2017”.

The GST department has filed the review petition on the Safari Retreats Ruling after deciding to amend the provisions and correct the ‘plant and machinery’ in the 55th GST Council  meeting. It may be a strategy to substantiate the retrospective amendment proposed by the GST council as constitutional.

Case Details

Case Title: Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. Versus M/s. Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors.

Case No.: Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023

Date: May 20, 2025

Read More: Divorced Woman Accused of Adultery Not Entitled To Maintenance: Chhattisgarh High Court 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside an...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 June, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for June 24, 2026.GSTBOMBAY HIGH COURT ADMITS CHALLENGE...

Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench, has set aside...

Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...