HomeGSTSafari Judgement Review Petition Filed By GST Dept. Dismissed: Supreme Court

Safari Judgement Review Petition Filed By GST Dept. Dismissed: Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petition filed by the Goods and Service Tax (GST) department in the case of Safari Retreat.

The bench of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karo has stated, “We have gone through the review petition and perused the Judgment and Order dated 03 October 2024 which has been sought to be reviewed. There is no error apparent on the record.”

The court dismissed the petition.

“Error In Drafting GST Act, 2017” Says CBIC Chairman, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal: 55th GST Council Meet

The CBIC Chairman, Sanjay Kumar Agarwal while addressing Press Conference Of 55th GST Council Meet said, “Error In Drafting GST Act, 2017”.

The GST department has filed the review petition on the Safari Retreats Ruling after deciding to amend the provisions and correct the ‘plant and machinery’ in the 55th GST Council  meeting. It may be a strategy to substantiate the retrospective amendment proposed by the GST council as constitutional.

Case Details

Case Title: Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors. Versus M/s. Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors.

Case No.: Civil Appeal No.2948 of 2023

Date: May 20, 2025

Read More: Divorced Woman Accused of Adultery Not Entitled To Maintenance: Chhattisgarh High Court 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that legal representatives of a deceased party cannot bypass...

GST Arrest: Allahabad HC Allows Habeas Corpus Despite Its Earlier Bail Rejection & Pending SLP Before SC

In a striking development raising critical questions on the scope of constitutional remedies in...

Supreme Court Orders Back Wages from 1993, Slams Employer for Delayed Regularisation of Daily Wage Worker

The Supreme Court held that an employee illegally deprived of regularisation cannot be denied...

Essential Qualification Can’t Be Substituted by Higher Degree; Appointment Without Required Experience Invalid: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India has held that essential eligibility conditions prescribed in recruitment...

More like this

Arbitration Act is a Complete Code: Legal Heirs Must Challenge Arbitral Award Under S. 34, Not Article 227: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that legal representatives of a deceased party cannot bypass...

GST Arrest: Allahabad HC Allows Habeas Corpus Despite Its Earlier Bail Rejection & Pending SLP Before SC

In a striking development raising critical questions on the scope of constitutional remedies in...

Supreme Court Orders Back Wages from 1993, Slams Employer for Delayed Regularisation of Daily Wage Worker

The Supreme Court held that an employee illegally deprived of regularisation cannot be denied...