Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTNo GST On Transfer Of Leasehold Rights : Gujarat High Court

No GST On Transfer Of Leasehold Rights : Gujarat High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court while quashing the show cause notice and the order has held that no Goods and Service Tax is payable on the  transfer of leasehold rights since it would be transfer of immovable property and therefore question of Input Tax Credit (ITC) would not arise.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Niral R. Mehta has observed that assignment by sell in transfer of leasehold rights of the plot of land allotted by Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) to the lease in favour of the assignee for a consideration shall be assignment sale transfer of immovable property by assignor on favour of third party assignee would become lessee of GIDC.

The bench noted that in such circumstances  provision of Section 7(1)(a) of GST Act providing for scope of supply read with clause 5E of Schedule II and clause 5 of Schedule III would not be applicable to the transaction of assignment of leasehold rights of land and building and the same would not be subjected to the levy of GST as provided under Section 9 of GST Act

The petitioner submitted that, though in accordance with Schedule-II of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, which deals in activities to be treated as supply of goods and supply of services, any lease, tenancy or easement, license to occupy land is a supply of services and would therefore come under the purview of CGST Act, what is actually being taxed in the hands of the petitioner is a sale of land which otherwise is an activity not falling within the supply of services in accordance with Schedule III of the Act.

The court allowed the petition in favour of the petitioner/assessees/.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...

S. 74 GST Can’t Be Invoked to Question CENVAT Credit Availed Under Pre-GST Regime: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that GST authorities cannot invoke Section...

Service Tax Order Passed 8.5 Years After SCN Quashed: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed a service tax adjudication order against the Assam...

DRI Busts International Gold-Smuggling Syndicate Operated By Chinese National

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Mumbai Zonal Unit, has busted an international gold-smuggling...

More like this

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...

S. 74 GST Can’t Be Invoked to Question CENVAT Credit Availed Under Pre-GST Regime: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that GST authorities cannot invoke Section...

Service Tax Order Passed 8.5 Years After SCN Quashed: Meghalaya High Court

The Meghalaya High Court has quashed a service tax adjudication order against the Assam...