HomeGSTGST Assessment Passed Against Deceased Person Quashed; Madras High Court Allows Legal...

GST Assessment Passed Against Deceased Person Quashed; Madras High Court Allows Legal Heir to Respond

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has quashed the Goods and Service Tax (GST) assessment passed against the deceased person and allowed the legal heir of the deceased person to respond.

The bench of Justice C.Saravanan recognized the petitioner as a legal heir who may have an interest in the business formerly operated by the deceased assessee, the High Court found merit in the plea. The court noted that the assessment order was passed against a person who was no longer alive, and hence, the order could not be sustained.

The petitioner is the legal heir of one M.John Bosco, an assessee under the provisions of the respective GST enactments, who died on 06.05.2021. The assessment order is for the assessment year 2019-20 (Tax period :April 2019 to March 2020).

The petitioner, claimed to be the son of the diseased, M.John Bosco, submits that the petitioner may be given one opportunity to reply to the show cause notice that preceded the order. The petitioner will cooperate with the respondents.

The court held that since the order has been passed the against the dead person and his son may have an interest in the business of the deceased assessee, namely M.John Bosco, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months.

Case Details

Case Title: Sahaya Kapil Bosco Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer

Case No.: W.P.(MD) No.15393 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD) No.11634 of 2025

Date:  09.06.2025

Counsel For Petitioner:  N.Sudalai Muthu

Counsel For Respondent: J.K.Jayaselan

Read More: Calcutta HC Refuses to Interfere in GST Council’s Decision Imposing 5% GST On Kerosene Oil 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Whether ‘May’ Can Replace Mandatory Pre-SCN Consultation? Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Final GST Adjudication 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging...

Bank Certificate Can Substitute FIRC in GST Export Cases: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that GST authorities cannot mechanically confirm tax demands...

GST SCN Without Alleging Fraud Cannot Invoke S. 74: Karnataka High Court Quashes Adjudication Order

The Karnataka High Court has held that proceedings under Section 74 of the Central...

GST SCN Generated Using AI Tool Quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court 

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has quashed a GST Show Cause Notice (SCN)...

More like this

Whether ‘May’ Can Replace Mandatory Pre-SCN Consultation? Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Final GST Adjudication 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging...

Bank Certificate Can Substitute FIRC in GST Export Cases: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that GST authorities cannot mechanically confirm tax demands...

GST SCN Without Alleging Fraud Cannot Invoke S. 74: Karnataka High Court Quashes Adjudication Order

The Karnataka High Court has held that proceedings under Section 74 of the Central...