Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCalcutta HC Refuses to Interfere in GST Council's Decision Imposing 5% GST...

Calcutta HC Refuses to Interfere in GST Council’s Decision Imposing 5% GST On Kerosene Oil 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has refused to interfere in the GST Council’s decision imposing  5% GST on kerosene oil.

The bench of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De has dismissed a writ petition challenging the imposition of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) supplied under the Public Distribution System (PDS), observing that the decision was taken by the GST Council after due consideration.

The Court noted that the issue of GST on SKO was discussed by the GST Council in its meeting held on September 20, 2019. The Council, after taking into account the recommendations of an expert committee, decided to apply a concessional GST rate of 5% on the product instead of the standard 18%.

The bench observed that this reduced rate had already mitigated the potential impact on the end price of kerosene oil and that any resulting price increase was negligible. Given these circumstances, the Court stated it saw no reason to interfere with the decision of the GST Council.

“In such view of the matter, we do not want to interfere with the order of the GST Council,” the Court remarked, while disposing of both the writ petition and the accompanying application.

Case Details

Case Title: Kishor Kumar Mondol Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: WPA (P) 86 of 2021

Date:  12.06.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: B.N. Ray, Shetparna Ray 

Counsel For Respondent: Vipul Kundalia, Sr. Adv.

Read More: State GST Dept Can Act Against CGST-Registered Entity for Non-Deposit of GST: Jharkhand HC Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost on Transporter

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...