HomeGSTCalcutta HC Refuses to Interfere in GST Council's Decision Imposing 5% GST...

Calcutta HC Refuses to Interfere in GST Council’s Decision Imposing 5% GST On Kerosene Oil 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has refused to interfere in the GST Council’s decision imposing  5% GST on kerosene oil.

The bench of Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De has dismissed a writ petition challenging the imposition of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on Superior Kerosene Oil (SKO) supplied under the Public Distribution System (PDS), observing that the decision was taken by the GST Council after due consideration.

The Court noted that the issue of GST on SKO was discussed by the GST Council in its meeting held on September 20, 2019. The Council, after taking into account the recommendations of an expert committee, decided to apply a concessional GST rate of 5% on the product instead of the standard 18%.

The bench observed that this reduced rate had already mitigated the potential impact on the end price of kerosene oil and that any resulting price increase was negligible. Given these circumstances, the Court stated it saw no reason to interfere with the decision of the GST Council.

“In such view of the matter, we do not want to interfere with the order of the GST Council,” the Court remarked, while disposing of both the writ petition and the accompanying application.

Case Details

Case Title: Kishor Kumar Mondol Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Case No.: WPA (P) 86 of 2021

Date:  12.06.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: B.N. Ray, Shetparna Ray 

Counsel For Respondent: Vipul Kundalia, Sr. Adv.

Read More: State GST Dept Can Act Against CGST-Registered Entity for Non-Deposit of GST: Jharkhand HC Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost on Transporter

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST ITC Dispute Over ERP Software Must Be Decided on Proof of Utilisation, Not Just Bogus Supplier Allegation: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that Input Tax Credit (ITC) dispute over ERP...

Importer Can’t Be Penalised When Exporter’s DFIA Licence Remained Valid, Fraud Allegations Failed: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST Search Without Sharing DIN Violates Transparency Safeguards, But Doesn’t Invalidate Search: Madras High Court

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that while the Document...

EDCT Machine Rentals Attract VAT as ‘Transfer of Right to Use Goods’: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has held that rental charges collected by banks from merchant...

More like this

GST ITC Dispute Over ERP Software Must Be Decided on Proof of Utilisation, Not Just Bogus Supplier Allegation: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that Input Tax Credit (ITC) dispute over ERP...

Importer Can’t Be Penalised When Exporter’s DFIA Licence Remained Valid, Fraud Allegations Failed: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

GST Search Without Sharing DIN Violates Transparency Safeguards, But Doesn’t Invalidate Search: Madras High Court

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has held that while the Document...