Jharkhand High Court Allows ITC on Delayed GST Returns Following Finance Act, 2024 Amendment

The Jharkhand High Court has set aside orders denying input tax credit (ITC) on delayed returns, upholding the retrospective application of clause (5) to Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, as inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024.

The bench of Chief Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Deepak Roshan has disposed of the writ petition challenging the rejection of ITC claims for the period from June 2018 to March 2019 due to the late filing of returns. 

The petitioner had filed the returns after the due date, leading the authorities to deny the corresponding ITC based on the prevailing interpretation of Section 16.

However, the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024 introduced clause (5) to Section 16 with retrospective effect from July 1, 2017, effectively allowing ITC even in cases where returns were filed belatedly, provided other conditions of eligibility were met. Further clarification was issued via a circular dated October 15, 2024, by the GST Policy Wing of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), directing field formations to honor ITC claims in line with the amended provisions.

Taking cognizance of these developments, the Jharkhand High Court observed that the orders challenged in the writ petition—ran contrary to the legislative intent and the latest policy directive. Accordingly, the Court quashed both orders and directed the department to permit the petitioner to avail input tax credits for the delayed returns concerning the aforementioned period.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s M. India Enterprises Versus Principal Commissioner,

Case No.: W.P.(T) No. 3123 of 2024

Date: 09.04.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Deepak Kr. Sinha

Counsel For Respondent: P. A. S Pati

Read More: No Specific HC’s Orders Required for Releasing Goods U/s 129 CGST Act: Kerala High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Exchange Of Silver Scrap For Finished Ornaments Is ‘Supply’ Under GST; E-Way Bill Not Mandatory: AAR

The Tamil Nadu Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the…
Belated Challenge To Single GST SCN For Multiple Years Is An Attempt To Abruptly Stall Multi-Tiered Adjudicatory Process: Calcutta HC

Belated Challenge To Single GST SCN For Multiple Years Is An Attempt To Abruptly Stall Multi-Tiered Adjudicatory Process: Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has challenged the single show cause notice for…

Food Supply To Patients By Service Provider In Hospital Is Not A Composite Supply Included In Health Care Services: AAR

The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that supply…

Mahendra Ranga, Principal Chief Commissioner of CGST Rajasthan, Passes Away – A Legacy of Distinguished Service

It is with profound sadness that we extend our heartfelt condolences on…