Contractor Seeks Differential GST After Housing Board Applied Lower Tax Rate Contrary to Statutory Notification: Madras HC Directs Board to Decide

HomeGSTContractor Seeks Differential GST After Housing Board Applied Lower Tax Rate Contrary...

Contractor Seeks Differential GST After Housing Board Applied Lower Tax Rate Contrary to Statutory Notification: Madras HC Directs Board to Decide

GST

Published on

31/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Contractor Seeks Differential GST After Housing Board Applied Lower Tax Rate Contrary to Statutory Notification: Madras HC Directs Board to Decide

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB) to consider and dispose of a contractor’s long-pending representation seeking payment of the differential Goods and Services Tax (GST) amount arising from the application of an allegedly incorrect tax rate on government construction contracts. The bench of Justice N. Sathish Kumar ordered that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Contractor Seeks Differential GST After Housing Board Applied Lower Tax Rate Contrary to Statutory Notification: Madras HC Directs Board to Decide

Membership Required

Latest articles

CIT(A) Can’t Direct Reopening of Another AY: ITAT

Form 26AS Receipts vs Income — Assessee Fails to Prove ₹7.83 Crore Difference Was NPGCL Advance: ITAT

Telangana High Court Restores Income Tax Appeals Dismissed Over Unsigned Memoranda

27% Rule 87 Ceiling Inapplicable to Extraordinary Superannuation Fund Contributions Made to Meet Actuarial Deficit: Calcutta High Court

More like this

CIT(A) Can’t Direct Reopening of Another AY: ITAT

Form 26AS Receipts vs Income — Assessee Fails to Prove ₹7.83 Crore Difference Was NPGCL Advance: ITAT

Telangana High Court Restores Income Tax Appeals Dismissed Over Unsigned Memoranda

About us

Company

Categories