HomeGSTNo Specific HC’s Orders Required for Releasing Goods U/s 129 CGST Act:...

No Specific HC’s Orders Required for Releasing Goods U/s 129 CGST Act: Kerala High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that no specific orders are required for release of goods under Section 129 CGST Act upon statutory compliance.

The bench of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas has observed that the department has initiated proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act. The statutory scheme provides for release of the goods on compliance with the stipulations therein. Specific orders from the High Court are not necessary.

The Petitioner is in the business of purchase and supply of arecanut. While the petitioner was allegedly transporting arecanut in a vehicle, it was intercepted and a statement of the driver was taken. 

Subsequently, an order for physical verification of the goods was issued. In the meantime, the petitioner requested to release the vehicle after accepting the tax and penalty calculated on the value in excess of what is covered by the E-way bill. 

Though physical verification was carried out on 09.04.2025, the officer insisted the petitioner to appear for carrying out detailed inspection and issued an order of detention under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act. 

The department submitted that an order of detention has been issued and a detailed verification of the goods is required to be done for which purpose the petitioner was asked to be present in person. However, since he has not yet appeared, the verification could not be carried out in its entirety.

The petitioner has expressed its willingness to pay the amount of penalty or other sum that may be imposed. In such circumstances, there seems to be no serious dispute except that the respondent wants to have a physical verification of the entire goods to identify whether any other proceedings are required to be initiated as contemplated by the statute or otherwise.

The court held that no orders are required to be issued except to observe that as and when petitioner appears before the respondent, the physical verification of the goods shall be carried out without any delay and if any penalty or other demands are made in accordance with Section 129 of the CGST Act and if the petitioner pays the same, appropriate orders shall be issued. On compliance of the orders, the department shall release the goods and vehicle, in accordance with law. The physical verification of the entire goods shall be carried out on the day the petitioner appears before the department.

Case Details

Case Title: Sobha Enterprises Versus Asst. Enforcement Officer

Case No.: WP(C) NO. 15725 OF 2025

Date: 11/04/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: S.Anil Kumar

Counsel For Respondent: Jasmin M.M.

Read More: Bail In Economic Offences Must Be Granted Sparingly: Supreme Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail In Adarsh Scam

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the blocking of Input Tax...

Hotels Can’t Claim Service Tax Abatement After Availing CENVAT Credit On Maintenance, Internet & Courier Services: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Delayed Payment Charges On Stock Broking Advances Are Interest, Not Taxable Service: CESTAT

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Mixed Iron Ore Consignments To Be Treated As Iron Ore Fines: CESTAT 

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the blocking of Input Tax...