Audit Findings Communicated by Non-“Proper Officer” Held Jurisdictionally Invalid: Orissa HC Stays GST Demand

HomeGSTAudit Findings Communicated by Non-“Proper Officer” Held Jurisdictionally Invalid: Orissa HC Stays...

Audit Findings Communicated by Non-“Proper Officer” Held Jurisdictionally Invalid: Orissa HC Stays GST Demand

GST Top Stories

Published on

01/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Audit Findings Communicated by Non-“Proper Officer” Held Jurisdictionally Invalid: Orissa HC Stays GST Demand

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has stayed further proceedings pursuant to a GST demand-cum-show cause notice holding that the audit findings forming the very foundation of the demand were communicated by an non-proper officer who was not competent under the GST law. The bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M.S. Raman found a prima…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Audit Findings

Audit Findings Communicated by Non-“Proper Officer” Held Jurisdictionally Invalid: Orissa HC Stays GST Demand

Membership Required

Latest articles

Parallel GST Proceedings Not Barred Where Different Years & Distinct Allegations Involved: Delhi HC

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh

Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order

No “Make Available” of Technical Knowledge: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Taxability of Receipts Under India–US DTAA

More like this

Parallel GST Proceedings Not Barred Where Different Years & Distinct Allegations Involved: Delhi HC

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh

Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order

About us

Company

Categories