HomeGSTIOCL Not Entitled To Collect GST From LPG Distributors On Penalty Imposed...

IOCL Not Entitled To Collect GST From LPG Distributors On Penalty Imposed For Non-Attendance Of Leakage Complaint: Kerala High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) is not entitled to collect GST from LPG distributors on penalty  imposed for non-attendance of leakage complaint.

The bench of Justice Harisankar V. Menon has observed that amounts are sought to be recovered as a deterrent against future breach of contract between the petitioners and the respondent Corporation. The amounts sought to be recovered are under no stretch of imagination being collected towards tolerating the violation of the terms of the MDG. Therefore, the IOCL is not entitled to collect GST from the petitioners/LPG distributors.

The petitioners are the distributors of LPG appointed by the IOCL challenging orders imposing penalty, appellate orders, as also the Marketing Discipline Guidelines, 2018 under which the penalty is imposed.

The penalties were imposed with respect to a complaint raised by a consumer/customer alleging non-attendance of a leakage complaint. The petitioner has raised a contention to the effect that there was no deliberate non-attendance of the complaint as alleged, that the complaint was received at its end only on 21.8.2020 by 4:33 pm, that the complaint was attended by the mechanic through a telephone call by 5:30 pm/5:45 pm etc. 

The petitioners have challenged the GST demand of Rs.28242.45 and it is sought to be recovered from the petitioner. The IOCL has sought to demand Rs.22,140 towards GST.

The petitioner contended that the demand of GST as above was without any justification and arbitrary. He points out that there is no “supply of service” so as to demand GST from the petitioners. 

The court while allowing the petition held that an agreement cannot be presumed to exist between the parties also. Here, the amounts sought to be collected from the petitioners towards penalty are not towards tolerating an act/situation. Instead, the amounts sought to be recovered are for not following the terms of the agreement/MDG framed by the respondent corporation. 

Case Details

Case Title: M/S.Aswathy Gas Agencies Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Case No.:  WP(C) NO.2552 OF 2021

Date: 12/12/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: Adv. R.Surendran

Counsel For Respondent: M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar

Read More: Govt. Challenges GMR Order In Delayed Adjudication Affecting 250 Cases: Supreme Court Restrains HC And CESTAT From Deciding Till Final Order

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Sub-Contractor Executing Works Within SEZ Entitled To Service Tax Exemption Even If Services Routed Through Main Contractors: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Service Tax Payable By Research Institutes On Grants-In-Aid Received From Government: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Interest On Delayed Excise Refund Payable After 3 Months From Refund Application, Not From Appellate Order: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Raised Merely On ST-3 And Income Tax Return Mismatch Without Examining Books Of Accounts: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Sub-Contractor Executing Works Within SEZ Entitled To Service Tax Exemption Even If Services Routed Through Main Contractors: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No Service Tax Payable By Research Institutes On Grants-In-Aid Received From Government: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Interest On Delayed Excise Refund Payable After 3 Months From Refund Application, Not From Appellate Order: CESTAT

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...