Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesGovt. Challenges GMR Order In Delayed Adjudication Affecting 250 Cases: Supreme Court...

Govt. Challenges GMR Order In Delayed Adjudication Affecting 250 Cases: Supreme Court Restrains HC And CESTAT From Deciding Till Final Order

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has deferred the hearing on the petition filed by the government challenging the GMR Order passed by the Delhi High Court in delayed adjudication affecting 250 cases.

“Since we are looking into the larger issues involved in this matter, before the Tribunal or any of the High Courts On the subject in we may only say that if any matter Comes up for hearing question, the hearing may be deferred till we take an appropriate call in the matter,” the bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan said.

The department contended that almost 250 matters came to be disposed of by the Tribunal following the judgment of the High Court of Delhi.

The Delhi High Court has held that Ultimately it is incumbent upon the authority to establish that it was genuinely hindered and impeded in resolving the dispute with reasonable speed and dispatch. A statutory authority when faced with such a challenge would be obligated to prove that it was either impracticable to proceed or it was constricted by factors beyond its control which prevented it from moving with reasonable expedition. This principle would apply equally to cases falling either under the Customs Act, the 1994 Act or the CGST Act.

Case Details

Case Title: UNION OF INDIA Versus GMR Airport

Case No.: SLP No.5392/2025

Date: 02-05-2025

Counsel For Petitioner: N. Venkataraman, A.S.G.

Counsel For Respondent: Dr S. Muralidhar, Sr. Adv.

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Interest On Delayed Return Of Seized Cash Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Tax Law Has No Express Provision: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that income tax authorities must compensate...

GST Confiscation Order Passed Before Reply Deadline Invalid: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Rajkot Bench, has set aside a...

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Wrong Death Date In Official Certificate Does Not Establish Cheating Or Forgery: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case 

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman accused of furnishing an...

More like this

Interest On Delayed Return Of Seized Cash Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Tax Law Has No Express Provision: Punjab and Haryana High Court 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that income tax authorities must compensate...

GST Confiscation Order Passed Before Reply Deadline Invalid: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Rajkot Bench, has set aside a...

Incomplete E-Bike Kits Classifiable As Complete Vehicles, But Not Eligible For CKD Duty Concession: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...