HomeGSTGST Officer Gave No Reasons Beyond Claim That Taxpayer ‘Did Not Reply’:...

GST Officer Gave No Reasons Beyond Claim That Taxpayer ‘Did Not Reply’: Delhi HC Quashes Demand

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has quashed the goods and service tax (GST) demand as the GST Demand Order did not give any reason beyond the claim that the taxpayer ‘did not reply’. The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain has quashed a GST demand order of ₹1.09 lakh after finding that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Construction of Flats Before July 2012 Not Taxable as Construction Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has partly allowed...

18% GST Payable on Entire Hotel Booking Consideration: AAR

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that a hospitality company proposing to...

Separate Erection Contract Is Not Works Contract, CESTAT Denies Abatement but Excludes Free-Supply Material from Taxable Value

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...

Consultancy Services to US Client Not Intermediary Services: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

Construction of Flats Before July 2012 Not Taxable as Construction Service: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has partly allowed...

18% GST Payable on Entire Hotel Booking Consideration: AAR

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that a hospitality company proposing to...

Separate Erection Contract Is Not Works Contract, CESTAT Denies Abatement but Excludes Free-Supply Material from Taxable Value

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has...