Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST On E-procurement Transaction Fee Collected On Behalf Of State Govt: AAAR

GST On E-procurement Transaction Fee Collected On Behalf Of State Govt: AAAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Telangana Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) has ruled that Goods and Service Tax (GST) is applicable on e-procurement transaction fee collected on behalf of the state government.

The bench of Sandeep Prakash and S.A.M Rizvi while upholding the AAR’s ruling has observed that the -Procurement transaction fee collected on behalf of ITE&C Department towards online tenders’ results in supply within the meaning of supply as defined in CGST Act.

The appellant, M/s Telangana State Technology Services Limited(TSTSL) Telangana State Public Sector Undertaking and TSTSL is a Service Agency to the Telangana Government and its Departments Relating to Information Technology and its related services.

One of services provided by TSTSL is, acting as a fund manager on behalf of IT E&C Department, Telangana State in executing -procurement process as per Government the information was issued by Technology, Electronics & Communications Department.

As per the guidelines issued through above stated GO, TSTSL as fund manager receives entire amounts lie e-Procurement Transaction charges) into a designated Bank Accounts On receipt of the Procurement Transaction Fees (inch of GST), TSTS is paying GST 18%on the entire e Procurement Transaction Fees on monthly basis And ISTS recognizes its share of Service Charges 45 and again pays GST @18% on monthly basis. The balance amounts are utilizing IT expenditure towards the specific requirements of the Concerned Departments of Telangana State.

The appellant is of the opinion that he is acting as a pure agent on behalf of the State government which is floating tender’s amounting to supply of services and such supply may not attract tax under CGST Act, 2017.

The AAAR upheld the order passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling.

Ruling Details

Appellant Name: Telangana State Technology Services Limited (TSTSL)

Date: 20.02.2025

Read More: GST Liability On Developers Arises At Possession Transfer, Not On Receipt Of Development Rights: AAAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...

Missing Original Document Doesn’t Automatically Defeat Forgery Case: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the absence of an original document alleged to...

Contract Clause Bars Pre-Reference Interest on Delayed Payments: Supreme Court Sets Aside Part of Arbitration Award

A contractual clause that separately bars interest on delayed payments prevents an arbitral tribunal...

Customs Can’t Use Residual Penalty Provision After Confiscation Grounds Fail: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has dismissed two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs...

More like this

Indian Marriage Doesn’t Automatically Bar Divorce Proceedings Abroad: Supreme Court Quashes Injunction Against UK Case

The Supreme Court has held that an Indian court cannot restrain a spouse from...

Missing Original Document Doesn’t Automatically Defeat Forgery Case: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the absence of an original document alleged to...

Contract Clause Bars Pre-Reference Interest on Delayed Payments: Supreme Court Sets Aside Part of Arbitration Award

A contractual clause that separately bars interest on delayed payments prevents an arbitral tribunal...