HomeDirect TaxRelief To Vodafone: ITAT Allows Rs.1,247 Crore Depreciation on 3G Spectrum Rights

Relief To Vodafone: ITAT Allows Rs.1,247 Crore Depreciation on 3G Spectrum Rights

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while granting relief to Vodafone has allowed Rs.1,247 crore depreciation on 3G spectrum rights.

The bench of Shriyogesh Kumar U.S. (Judicial Member) and  S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has observed that spectrum qualifies as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act.

The appellant/assessee, Vodafone Idea Ltd. challenged the disallowance of depreciation amounting to ₹12,47,17,47,967 on the “Right to Use 3G Spectrum,” which it had capitalized and treated as an intangible asset under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act.

The assessee argued that the spectrum fee was capital in nature and eligible for depreciation as an intangible asset. Section 35ABB applies only to license fees for telecom services, not to spectrum rights. Section 35ABA (for amortization of spectrum fee) was introduced only from AY 2017–18 and therefore did not apply to the year under consideration. Relied on earlier ITAT rulings in group cases (Vodafone India Ltd. and Idea Cellular Ltd.) and similar rulings in Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd.

The Assessing Officer disallowed the depreciation and amortized the expenditure under Section 35ABB, with the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upholding this view.

The ITAT observed that identical issues had already been decided in favour of the assessee in earlier group company cases. Respectfully following those precedents, it held that depreciation on 3G spectrum rights is allowable.

Case Details

Case Title: Vodafone Idea Ltd Versus ACIT

Case No.: ITA No. 8361/Del/2019

Date: 24/10/2025

Counsel For  Appellant:  Salil Kapoor, Adv

Counsel For Respondent: S. K,. Jadav, CIT DR

Read More: ITAT Deletes Rs. 1,205 Crore Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Vodafone–Essar Trademark Royalty

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

No Writ in GST Refund Rejection; Assessee Must Approach GSTAT: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere in a GST refund dispute filed...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : APRIL 29, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for APRIL 29, 2026.GSTGST Not Leviable on Affiliation...

Service Tenure Can Be Curtailed Without It Being Punitive If Order Is Non-Stigmatic: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the curtailment of tenure of a senior अधिकारी, holding...

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 33.78 Crore Excise Demand on Home Appliances, Rules Extended Limitation Not Invocable

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...