HomeDirect TaxPROCEEDINGS IMPOSING PENALTY ON CONTRAVENTION OF PENAL PROVISIONS ARE QUASI-CRIMINAL ONUS ON...

PROCEEDINGS IMPOSING PENALTY ON CONTRAVENTION OF PENAL PROVISIONS ARE QUASI-CRIMINAL ONUS ON DEPT. TO GIVE CATEGORICAL FINDING: ITAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Author: Khushi J Prajapati

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi affirmed that proceedings related to the imposition of penalties for contraventions of penal provisions under tax laws are quasi-criminal.

The ITAT critically assessed the evidence provided by the Assessing Officer (AO), noting that reliance on seized documents and statements from individuals associated with Shri Asharam Bapu was insufficient.

The Tribunal highlighted that it is the responsibility of the revenue department to provide clear and categorical findings to justify the imposition of penalties.

Citing relevant judgments, including Shri Surjeet Singh Chhabra vs. Union of India and CIT vs. Kuwer Fibres Pvt Ltd, the ITAT reiterated that while confessions may be considered, they must be supported by strong corroborative evidence to substantiate penalties.

Due to the inadequacy of evidence and specific findings provided by the revenue department, the ITAT concluded that the penalties could not be upheld.

FACTS

Vishwanath Aggarwal was accused of violating sections 269SS and 269T of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to accepting and repaying cash loans exceeding the permissible limit.

 During assessments under section 153A read with section 143(3), it was found that Aggarwal had received large cash loans from Shri Asharam Bapu and his associates, contrary to the provisions requiring transactions above Rs. 20,000 to be conducted via account payee cheques or drafts.

 Evidence obtained during a search operation under section 132A, including documents seized by Surat police, revealed cash transactions between Aggarwal and Asharam Bapu’s group.

 The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for these violations. The appeals were consolidated and adjudicated by the ITAT, Delhi Benches.

Case Details

Parties Involved: Vishwanath Aggarwal (Appellant) vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Addl. CIT), Range-05, Delhi (Respondent)

Case Numbers: ITAs No. 611 to 618/Del/2022

Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14

Bench: SHRI G.S. PANNU (Vice President) and SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

Pronouncement Date: 26 July 2024

Download Order / Judgment

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Decree Can Be Both Preliminary And Final In Substance: Supreme Court Restores Execution Proceedings 

The Supreme Court has held that a decree cannot be interpreted merely on the...

Long Incarceration Can’t Override Article 21: Supreme Court Grants Bail In UAPA–NDPS Case Despite Stringent Statutory Restrictions

The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgment on the balance between personal liberty...

Conviction Shouldn’t Affect Service Career: Supreme Court Grants Probation Relief to BMTC Driver in Fatal Accident Case

The Supreme Court has granted relief to a Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) driver...

Employees Have No Vested Right To Promotion; Govt. Can Change Recruitment Policy After Cadre Restructuring: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that government employees do not possess a vested or...

More like this

Decree Can Be Both Preliminary And Final In Substance: Supreme Court Restores Execution Proceedings 

The Supreme Court has held that a decree cannot be interpreted merely on the...

Long Incarceration Can’t Override Article 21: Supreme Court Grants Bail In UAPA–NDPS Case Despite Stringent Statutory Restrictions

The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgment on the balance between personal liberty...

Conviction Shouldn’t Affect Service Career: Supreme Court Grants Probation Relief to BMTC Driver in Fatal Accident Case

The Supreme Court has granted relief to a Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) driver...