HomeNotificationHaryana SGST Dept. Revised Monetary Limit for Proper officers

Haryana SGST Dept. Revised Monetary Limit for Proper officers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Excise and Taxation Department, Haryana has revised the monetary limits for adjudication and issuance of show cause notices by Proper Officers under Sections 73, 74 and 74A of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 

The revised instruction classifies Haryana districts into two groups and allocates powers between Excise and Taxation Officers (ETOs) and Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioners (DETCs).

Group-I Districts

Ambala, Faridabad, Gurugram, Hisar, Jhajjar, Karnal, Panchkula, Panipat, Rewari, Rohtak and Sonipat.

OfficerHGST CasesIGST CasesCombined HGST + IGST Cases
Excise and Taxation OfficerUp to ₹1 CroreUp to ₹2 CroreUp to ₹2 Crore
Deputy Excise and Taxation CommissionerAbove ₹1 CroreAbove ₹2 CroreAbove ₹2 Crore

Group-II Districts

Bhiwani, Mewat, Sirsa, Jagadhri, Jind, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Narnaul, Palwal and Fatehabad.

OfficerHGST CasesIGST CasesCombined HGST + IGST Cases
Excise and Taxation OfficerUp to ₹50 LakhUp to ₹1 CroreUp to ₹1 Crore
Deputy Excise and Taxation CommissionerAbove ₹50 LakhAbove ₹1 CroreAbove ₹1 Crore

The amendment has been issued by the Commissioner of State Tax, Haryana, in exercise of powers under Section 168 of the HGST Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. The objective is to streamline the allocation of adjudication work and ensure that cases involving different tax amounts are handled by officers of appropriate rank.

The department noted that monetary limits for different levels of State Tax Officers are required to be prescribed for the issuance of show cause notices and passing of orders under Sections 73, 74 and 74A of the HGST Act and corresponding provisions applicable to IGST matters. Accordingly, the earlier instruction has now been amended and a new jurisdictional matrix has been introduced.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 30 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 30, 2026.GSTGSTN ISSUES ADVISORY ON KEEPING...

AI-Led GST Crackdown Uncovers ₹74,782 Crore Fake ITC Fraud in FY26

The Central Government has significantly intensified its technology-driven crackdown on Goods and Services Tax...

No Appeal Lies Against Sessions Court Conviction Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is the Only Statutory Remedy: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an accused cannot file a statutory appeal under...

Cruise Operators Eligible for Presumptive Tax U/s 44B; Onboard Hospitality Doesn’t Change Nature of Passenger Carriage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that cruise operators providing passenger transportation remain eligible for...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 30 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 30, 2026.GSTGSTN ISSUES ADVISORY ON KEEPING...

AI-Led GST Crackdown Uncovers ₹74,782 Crore Fake ITC Fraud in FY26

The Central Government has significantly intensified its technology-driven crackdown on Goods and Services Tax...

No Appeal Lies Against Sessions Court Conviction Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is the Only Statutory Remedy: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an accused cannot file a statutory appeal under...