HomeDirect TaxITAT Quashes Income Tax Addition Based On ‘Dumb Documents’

ITAT Quashes Income Tax Addition Based On ‘Dumb Documents’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the income tax addition based on ‘dumb documents’.

The bench of Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member) and S. Rifaur Rahman (Accountant Member) has observed that as per the assessment findings some rough jottings and alleged map was seized from the searched person, which was in the nature of dumb document . The seized dumb document merely indicated some rates rather than pinpointing any specific on-money payment or receipt involving the assessee.

The department carried out a search action on 05.12.2007 in M/s. Kohinoor Foods Ltd. and its group of cases which allegedly led it to seizure of various incriminating documents “belonging” to the assessee. 

The department initiated section 153C’s proceedings in assessee’s case vide satisfaction note in the former twin assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. There is no dispute between the parties that the last assessment year before assessment year 2008-09 in fact involves an assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act.

The department contended that the Assessing Officer had rightly added the on-money sum of Rs.8.99 crores going by the contents of the seized material compiled in the paper-book. The seized document forms part of the case records.

The ITAT noted that neither the assessee’s name was mentioned in the seized documents nor the same could be held as satisfying the corresponding criteria of “belongs” to the taxpayer so as to trigger section 153C proceedings resulting in the impugned addition.

 The ITAT while upholding the deletion of the addition held that seized document merely indicates some rates than pinpointing any specific on-money payment or receipt; as the case may be, involving the assessee.

Case Details

Case Title: ACIT Versus New World Buildcon

Case No.: ITA No.5051/Del/2012

Date: 28.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant:  Salil Kapoor

Counsel For Respondent: Baljeet Kaur

Read More: BSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & Others

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

ITAT Slams Income Tax Dept. For on Third-Party Statements Without Independent Inquiry

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

DGFT’s Minimum Import Price Can’t Be Adopted for Valuation of EOU DTA Clearances: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

No PE for Oracle Systems in India: ITAT Deletes Notional Royalty Additions 

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has ruled in favour of Oracle...

More like this

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation 

The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set...

ITAT Slams Income Tax Dept. For on Third-Party Statements Without Independent Inquiry

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

DGFT’s Minimum Import Price Can’t Be Adopted for Valuation of EOU DTA Clearances: CESTAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...