Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsBSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI...

BSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & Others

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the registration of an FIR against former SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and other top officials in an alleged BSE listing fraud case. The case involves financial fraud, insider trading, and regulatory violations related to the listing of a company on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in 1994.

Justice SG Dige, while hearing the urgent plea, directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) not to act on the special court order until the next hearing. The matter will be taken up for further arguments tomorrow.

FIR was ordered by Special Judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar against Buch, three SEBI whole-time directors (Ashwani Bhatia, Ananth Narayan G, Kamlesh Chandra Varshney), and two BSE officials (Pramod Agarwal & Sundararaman Ramamurthy).

The complaint, filed by journalist Sapan Shrivastava, alleges regulatory lapses, market manipulation, and insider trading in violation of the SEBI Act, ICDR Regulations, LODR Regulations, and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The court found a prima facie case and ordered a probe due to the alleged inaction by SEBI and law enforcement agencies.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the SEBI officials, while Senior Advocate Amit Desai appeared for the BSE executives.

Read More: ICMAI Issues Advisory Against Unauthorized Activities Affecting Institute’s Integrity

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DRI Officers Competent To Issue Customs SCN: CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Conspiracy To Smuggle Prohibited R-22 Gas

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld customs...

Revenue-Neutral Reverse Charge Liability Cannot Justify Extended Limitation: CESTAT Restricts ₹27.27 Lakh Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

SEBI Can’t Be Compelled Under RTI Act to Collect Information From BSE: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the Securities and Exchange Board of India...

IBBI Must Be Circumspect While Issuing SCN Due to Serious Impact on Insolvency Professionals: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India...

More like this

DRI Officers Competent To Issue Customs SCN: CESTAT Upholds Penalty For Conspiracy To Smuggle Prohibited R-22 Gas

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has upheld customs...

Revenue-Neutral Reverse Charge Liability Cannot Justify Extended Limitation: CESTAT Restricts ₹27.27 Lakh Service Tax Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

SEBI Can’t Be Compelled Under RTI Act to Collect Information From BSE: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that the Securities and Exchange Board of India...