Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsBSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI...

BSE Listing Fraud Case | Bombay High Court Stays FIR Against Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch & Others

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has temporarily stayed the registration of an FIR against former SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch and other top officials in an alleged BSE listing fraud case. The case involves financial fraud, insider trading, and regulatory violations related to the listing of a company on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in 1994.

Justice SG Dige, while hearing the urgent plea, directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) not to act on the special court order until the next hearing. The matter will be taken up for further arguments tomorrow.

FIR was ordered by Special Judge Shashikant Eknathrao Bangar against Buch, three SEBI whole-time directors (Ashwani Bhatia, Ananth Narayan G, Kamlesh Chandra Varshney), and two BSE officials (Pramod Agarwal & Sundararaman Ramamurthy).

The complaint, filed by journalist Sapan Shrivastava, alleges regulatory lapses, market manipulation, and insider trading in violation of the SEBI Act, ICDR Regulations, LODR Regulations, and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The court found a prima facie case and ordered a probe due to the alleged inaction by SEBI and law enforcement agencies.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the SEBI officials, while Senior Advocate Amit Desai appeared for the BSE executives.

Read More: ICMAI Issues Advisory Against Unauthorized Activities Affecting Institute’s Integrity

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 25, 2026.GSTCAN GST APPEAL CAN’T BE...

Ship Can’t Remain Under Arrest for Former Charterer’s Debt After Valid Termination of Bareboat Charter: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has vacated the arrest of M.V. Nereus Progress, holding that its...

Missing Train Ticket Can’t Defeat Compensation Claim After Accidental Fall: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has restored ₹8 lakh in compensation to the parents of a...

Rape Conviction Can’t Rest on Inconsistent Testimony and Assumptions About Conduct: Supreme Court Acquits Man

The Supreme Court has set aside a 10-year prison sentence in a 2009 rape...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 25 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 25, 2026.GSTCAN GST APPEAL CAN’T BE...

Ship Can’t Remain Under Arrest for Former Charterer’s Debt After Valid Termination of Bareboat Charter: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has vacated the arrest of M.V. Nereus Progress, holding that its...

Missing Train Ticket Can’t Defeat Compensation Claim After Accidental Fall: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has restored ₹8 lakh in compensation to the parents of a...