S. 42 Of PMLA: Bombay High Court Refuses To Condone 132 Days Delay In Filing Appeal By ED

Date:

The Bombay High Court has refused to condone the delay of 132 days in filing the appeal by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

The bench of Justice B. P. Colabawalla and Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan has observed that beyond the total period of 120 days as stipulated in Section 42 of the PMLA, 2002, the High Court has no power to condone the delay. Since, the application seeking a condonation of delay is beyond the total period of 120 days, the Application seeking condonation of delay is liable to be dismissed. 

The Applicant/Appellant has filed the appeal under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 by the Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, challenging the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal. By the order, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondent-Bank against the order of the Adjudicating Authority confirming the Provisional Order of the Attachment levied by the Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Surat.

Since there is a delay in filing the Appeal, the above Interim Application is also filed seeking a condonation of delay. Though in the Interim Application, the period of delay is not mentioned, on the basis of the lists of dates and events tendered to this Court on 9th December 2024, the delay mentioned is 132 days.

The issue raised was whether the Court has the power to condone the delay beyond the total period of 120 days [sixty days being the prescribed period and a further period of sixty days being the grace period] as stipulated in Section 42 of the PMLA, 2002, read with its proviso. 

The court held that after the total period of 120 days as stipulated in Section 42 of the PMLA, 2002, read with its proviso, the High Court would have no power to condone the delay in preferring the Appeal.

Read More: Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CBDT Notification Restricting Section 80IB (10) Benefit Only To Housing Projects Approved After 1 April 2004 And Before…

Case Details

Case Title: The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement Versus The Branch Manager, The Goa State Co-op Bank Ltd.

Case No.: Interim Application No. 1958 Of 2024 In First Appeal (St.) No. 3056 Of 2024

Date: January 14, 2025

Counsel For Applicant: Adv. Ashish Chavan a/w Yash Palan

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Supreme Court Stays Arrest of YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia 

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of...

Input Tax Credit Under GST: Understand And Save Money

Goods and Services Tax (GST) has significantly transformed the...

Delhi Customs Arrests Man For Smuggling Diamond Necklace Worth Rs 6.08 Crores At IGI Airport

The Delhi Customs arrested a man for smuggling diamond...

Hindustan Zinc Not Entitled To ITC On Goods/Services Received For Increasing Tailing-Dam Height: AAR

The Rajasthan Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held...