Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 9, 2026.
GST
- IS PRIOR RETURN SCRUTINY MANDATORY FOR GST NOTICE? SUPREME COURT STAYS HIGH COURT RULING
- CANCELLED E-WAY BILLS ALONE CAN’T PROVE TAX EVASION; TRANSACTION-WISE VERIFICATION REQUIRED: GSTAT
- INVOICES PRODUCED 3 MONTHS AFTER GST SEARCH CAN’T CURE MISSING TRANSIT DOCUMENTS: GSTAT
- INTEREST CAN’T BE LEVIED ON GROUNDS BEYOND GST NOTICE: GSTAT
- ITC REFUND ALLOWED ON TEA PACKAGING TAXED AT 18% DESPITE 5% GST ON TEA: GSTAT
- GST PENALTY CAN’T EXCEED SCN AMOUNT, EVEN FOR CLERICAL ERROR: GSTAT
- CHATGPT AND CLAUDE WILL BE USED TO PREPARE GST PROSECUTION COMPLAINTS: DR. SUJAY KANTAWALA ON SCRAPPING GST ARREST POWERS
- GST REGISTRATION CAN’T BE RESTORED ON ₹26.26 LAKH CASH PAYMENT CONDITION WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE: GSTAT
- GST NOTICE LIMITATION: SUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE ON HOW 3 MONTH PERIOD MUST BE CALCULATED
- DISPUTED GST HEARING NOTICE MUST BE EXAMINED IN APPEAL; WRIT RELIEF DECLINED DESPITE GAPS IN 100% PENALTY ORDER: DELHI HC
- CREDIT NOTES REPORTED AS ITC CAN’T SUSTAIN ₹9.56 LAKH GST DEMAND WHERE NO TAX WAS LOST: GSTAT
- GST APPEAL CAN PROCEED AFTER DELAYED PAYMENT OF ADMITTED DUES; FILING DATE SHIFTS TO FULL COMPLIANCE: GSTAT
Customs Duty
Direct Tax
- IMPLEMENTATION OF TAX ORDER DOESN’T BAR RECONSIDERATION AFTER COURT REMAND: KARNATAKA HC
- INVESTORS NOT NAMED IN TRUST DEED: SUPREME COURT REJECTS CBDT APPEAL AGAINST TAX RELIEF
