Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDelhi High Court Bar Association Condemns ED's Summons to Senior Advocate Arvind...

Delhi High Court Bar Association Condemns ED’s Summons to Senior Advocate Arvind Datar

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) has strongly condemned the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) reported attempt to summon Senior Advocate Arvind Datar in connection with his privileged communications with a client.

In a press release issued today, DHCBA President N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate, expressed deep concern over what he described as a serious breach of legal ethics and constitutional protections. The association stated that the ED’s move to issue summons to a senior member of the bar in relation to confidential lawyer-client interactions is “an attack on the independence of the legal profession.”

The DHCBA emphasized that such actions undermine the right of individuals to secure legal representation of their choice and jeopardize the fundamental right to a fair trial. “Such attempts not only undermine the independence of the profession but also seriously impinge [on] the constitutional rights of being defended by a lawyer of one’s choice and a fair trial,” the press note read.

Legal experts have echoed similar sentiments, warning that interference with privileged communication could set a dangerous precedent and weaken the foundational principles of India’s adversarial legal system.

The DHCBA has called for immediate corrective action and urged all investigative agencies to uphold the sanctity of legal privilege and the rule of law.

Read More: MCA Penalises CA for Violating Auditor Resignation Norms Under Companies Act

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

More like this

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...