Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAMCA Penalises CA for Violating Auditor Resignation Norms Under Companies Act

MCA Penalises CA for Violating Auditor Resignation Norms Under Companies Act

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has penalised a Chartered Accountant for non-compliance with auditor resignation protocols as mandated under the Companies Act, 2013. 

The action was initiated against Shri Vijay Bora, a Chartered Accountant affiliated with M/s Doogar & Associates, for failing to adhere to Section 140(2) of the Act.

According to the Registrar of Companies (ROC), West Bengal, CA Vijay Bora did not file the mandated e-form ADT-3 following his resignation from his audit assignment, as required under Section 140(2). This provision mandates that any resigning auditor must submit a statement within 30 days of resignation to both the concerned company and the ROC, detailing the reasons for stepping down.

Despite being served with an adjudication notice, no response was submitted by the auditor. Consequently, the ROC imposed a penalty of ₹50,000. Multiple hearings were scheduled to address the matter, but the auditor’s authorised representative repeatedly sought adjournments. On May 5, 2025, the hearing finally proceeded, but no substantial grounds were provided to contest or reduce the penalty.

As per the order, the penalty of ₹50,000 is to be paid personally by the auditor within a 90-day period. Failure to comply with the payment requirement may trigger further legal action under Section 454(8)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013.

This case underscores the importance of statutory compliance by professionals under the Companies Act and serves as a reminder that procedural lapses, particularly in regulatory filings, can attract monetary penalties and legal consequences.

Read More: GST Amendment Application Stuck for Over 50 Days, Taxpayer Seeks Help

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...

GSTAT Denies 0.1% Export Concession For Drums Sent To Distilleries, Grants Partial Relief From S. 74

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that HDPE drums...

More like this

Commissioner’s Approval Can’t Override Rs. 20 Lakh Appeal Limit: GSTAT Dismisses Dept.’s Penalty Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has dismissed...

Defective GST Notice Can’t Sustain Rs. 2.50 Crore Recredit Demand: GSTAT Orders Reconciliation Of Tax Paid Under Wrong Head

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad State Bench, has set aside...

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...