HomeCompany & PMLAMCA Penalises CA for Violating Auditor Resignation Norms Under Companies Act

MCA Penalises CA for Violating Auditor Resignation Norms Under Companies Act

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has penalised a Chartered Accountant for non-compliance with auditor resignation protocols as mandated under the Companies Act, 2013. 

The action was initiated against Shri Vijay Bora, a Chartered Accountant affiliated with M/s Doogar & Associates, for failing to adhere to Section 140(2) of the Act.

According to the Registrar of Companies (ROC), West Bengal, CA Vijay Bora did not file the mandated e-form ADT-3 following his resignation from his audit assignment, as required under Section 140(2). This provision mandates that any resigning auditor must submit a statement within 30 days of resignation to both the concerned company and the ROC, detailing the reasons for stepping down.

Despite being served with an adjudication notice, no response was submitted by the auditor. Consequently, the ROC imposed a penalty of ₹50,000. Multiple hearings were scheduled to address the matter, but the auditor’s authorised representative repeatedly sought adjournments. On May 5, 2025, the hearing finally proceeded, but no substantial grounds were provided to contest or reduce the penalty.

As per the order, the penalty of ₹50,000 is to be paid personally by the auditor within a 90-day period. Failure to comply with the payment requirement may trigger further legal action under Section 454(8)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013.

This case underscores the importance of statutory compliance by professionals under the Companies Act and serves as a reminder that procedural lapses, particularly in regulatory filings, can attract monetary penalties and legal consequences.

Read More: GST Amendment Application Stuck for Over 50 Days, Taxpayer Seeks Help

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Registration Restoration Allowed After Taxpayer Clears Pending Returns and Dues: Gauhati High Court 

The Gauhati High Court has held that a taxpayer whose GST registration was cancelled...

Customs Dept. Can’t Challenge Consent Order It Agreed to Before CAT: Meghalaya HC

The Meghalaya High Court has declined to entertain a petition filed by the Union...

GST Officers Can’t Keep Business Premises Sealed After Search Ends: Gauhati HC 

The Gauhati High Court has held that the power of GST authorities to seal...

GST Appeal Limitation Must Run From DRC-07 Communication, Not Detailed Adjudication Order: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that GST appeals should not be rejected as...

More like this

GST Registration Restoration Allowed After Taxpayer Clears Pending Returns and Dues: Gauhati High Court 

The Gauhati High Court has held that a taxpayer whose GST registration was cancelled...

Customs Dept. Can’t Challenge Consent Order It Agreed to Before CAT: Meghalaya HC

The Meghalaya High Court has declined to entertain a petition filed by the Union...

GST Officers Can’t Keep Business Premises Sealed After Search Ends: Gauhati HC 

The Gauhati High Court has held that the power of GST authorities to seal...