Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTGST Amendment Application Stuck for Over 50 Days, Taxpayer Seeks Help

GST Amendment Application Stuck for Over 50 Days, Taxpayer Seeks Help

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A taxpayer’s application for a routine GST amendment has remained “Pending for Validation” for over 50 days on the GSTN portal, raising serious concerns over the digital infrastructure and responsiveness of the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) managed by Infosys.

The Issue at Hand

On April 29, 2025, Bhavya Gurjar filed GST REG-14 for a Non-Core amendment in registration particulars through the official GST portal. Despite providing all necessary documentation and repeatedly following up, the application continues to show “Pending for Validation” as of June 18, 2025.

A helpdesk ticket (G-202505021809655) was raised promptly with Infosys, the IT service provider for GSTN. However, multiple follow-ups and resubmissions of supporting documents have reportedly gone unanswered or unresolved.

Frustration and Escalation

Gurjar expressed frustration on social media, tagging Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, @cbic_india, and @FinMinIndia. “Despite giving all details to @Infosys_GSTN, my application is still not validated. What should I do to get my Non-Core amendment approved?” reads one of the posts.

What are Non-Core Amendments?

Non-Core fields include changes such as updating contact information, bank details, or authorized signatories—amendments that do not affect the basic constitution of the business. These are expected to be processed without physical verification or undue delay.

Broader Implications

This incident underscores the challenges many taxpayers face with the digital GST system, despite years of operation and significant public funds invested in its development. The GST Council and CBIC have long advocated digital compliance and ease of doing business, but such technical bottlenecks risk undermining trust.

Call for Accountability

Tax professionals are now urging the Ministry of Finance and the GST Council to intervene and streamline the back-end validation process, especially for non-core amendments which are supposed to be non-disruptive.

Unless addressed swiftly, this delay may set a concerning precedent for the responsiveness of the GST system to genuine taxpayer grievances.

Read More: Justice Yashwant Varma Refuses to Resign, Citing ‘Unjust’ Process in Misconduct Probe

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...

Officer Who Conducted GST Audit Can’t Issue Notice and Adjudicate Same Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has quashed a GST adjudication order after finding that the...

More like this

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere With GST Order Carrying RFN but No Separate DIN or Visible Signature

The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling...

Negligible Listing and Disposal of GSTAT Appeals: Supreme Court Asks Tribunal President to Examine Grievance

The Supreme Court has disposed of a public interest litigation seeking court-monitored institutional reforms...

Rule 96(10) Deemed Omitted From Inception: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Interest Paid on Import IGST

The Bombay High Court has held that no interest could be levied on the...