Finance Bill 2025 Introduces New Provision Enabling Cross-Verification of Inconsistencies in ITR

The Finance Bill 2025 has introduced significant amendments to Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, refining the mechanism of processing income tax returns (ITR) by introducing a new provision enabling cross-verification of inconsistencies in ITR. 

These amendments aim to enhance the accuracy of tax assessments by allowing the Income Tax Department to identify inconsistencies across different assessment years.

Overview of Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, governs the initial processing of income tax returns filed by taxpayers. Under this section, the tax department is authorized to make certain prescribed adjustments to the return before issuing an intimation. These adjustments include:

  • Rectification of arithmetical errors in the return;
  • Correction of incorrect claims that are apparent from the details furnished in the return.

Key Amendments to Section 143(1)

The Finance Bill 2025 introduces a new dimension to the processing of tax returns by enabling the tax authorities to check for inconsistencies between the current return and returns filed in previous assessment years. This amendment allows tax authorities to:

  • Cross-verify information declared by taxpayers with past filings;
  • Identify discrepancies and ensure consistency in tax claims and disclosures;
  • Enhance tax compliance by reducing errors and potential misreporting.

Nature of Inconsistencies Under the Amended Provisions

While specific inconsistencies to be scrutinized under the amended provision are yet to be prescribed, a plausible example could be:

  • A taxpayer claiming a credit in the previous return but not reflecting the corresponding figures in the current return.

This amendment is expected to streamline the return processing mechanism by ensuring that past tax filings are not at variance with current claims, thereby improving the integrity of tax assessments.

Read More: Finance Bill, 2025: Amendments In Chapter XIV-B Of Income-Tax Act 1961

Mariya Paliwala
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

S. 271(1)(c) Penalty Not Applicable On Voluntary Surrender, Bonafide Mistake: Chhattisgarh High Court 

The Chhattisgarh High Court has issued the clarification on the penalty under…

Nature Of Social Welfare Expenditure Can’t Be Altered Merely For Having Its Presence In Settlement Memorandum: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that merely because such expenditure finds…

Mere Use Of Expression ‘Yes, I Am Satisfied’ By PCIT Not A Valid Approval Under Section 151 Of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that mere use of the expression…

13-Year Delay in Tax Appeal: ITAT Indore Accepts Commercial Pilot’s Plea, Orders Fresh Assessment

The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted…