HomeCase CompilationJURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 AUGUST, 2026

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  August 12, 2026.

GST

  1. HIGH COURTS CAN’T GRANT POST-DISMISSAL ARREST PROTECTION IN GST PRE-ARREST BAIL MATTERS; S. 69 ARREST ORDER MUST BE COMMUNICATED: SUPREME COURT 
  2. MADRAS HIGH COURT STAYS GST RECOVERY INITIATED U/S 79 WITHOUT PRIOR DETERMINATION U/S 73
  3. GSTAT ASKS DEPT. TO SHOW TAX RECOVERY ACTION AGAINST SUPPLIER BEFORE DENYING ITC TO BUYER
  4. GSTAT ADMITS BHARTI AIRTEL’S APPEAL ON ITC DISPUTE INVOLVING SECTION 17(5)(C) AND (D) OF CGST ACT
  5. TAXABILITY OF SOLAR WATER PUMPING AND ROOFTOP POWER PLANT WORKS AS COMPOSITE WORKS CONTRACT: GSTAT ADMITS DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL 
  6. WHETHER RERA REGISTRATION CAN DETERMINE GST CLASSIFICATION OF ‘ONGOING PROJECT’? RAJASTHAN HC ISSUES STAY NOTICE
  7. WIND TURBINE GENERATORS HELD MOVABLE GOODS, NOT IMMOVABLE PROPERTY: SUPREME COURT DISMISSES GST DEPARTMENT’S CHALLENGE
  8. ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE, KACHCHA PARCHIS AND NATURAL JUSTICE CLAIMS CAN’T BYPASS GST APPELLATE REMEDY: DELHI HC
  9. GST BANK ATTACHMENT CAN’T CONTINUE BEYOND 1 YEAR: DELHI HIGH COURT

Service Tax

  1. SMALL-SERVICE PROVIDER EXEMPTION CAN’T BE DENIED WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF PRECEDING-YEAR TURNOVER: CESTAT
  2. CESTAT QUASHES SERVICE TAX DEMAND ON MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY, REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES AND OUT-OF-LIMITATION APPROPRIATION
  3. LC CHARGES RECOVERED IN HIGH SEAS SALE CAN’T BE TAXED AS BANKING SERVICE: CESTAT
  4. TRANSITIONAL CENVAT CREDIT CAN BE USED FOR SERVICE TAX PRE-DEPOSIT: KARNATAKA HC
  5. SHOWROOM INTERIOR FIT-OUTS CONSTITUTES “ORIGINAL WORKS”, CESTAT QUASHES ₹2.61 CRORE SERVICE TAX DEMAND

Customs Duty

  1. MULTI-HEADING USE OF MEDICAL LASER IMAGERS ATTRACTS RESIDUARY CUSTOMS CLASSIFICATION UNDER CTH 9033 00 00: SUPREME COURT 
  2. CUSTOMS SEIZE 788.5 GRAMS OF COCAINE CONCEALED IN BAGGAGE AT IGI AIRPORT, DELHI
  3. CESTAT UPHOLDS CUSTOMS DUTY DEMAND AGAINST TELECOM IMPORTERS
  4. 10% BASIC CUSTOMS DUTY APPLICABLE ON LED MODULES WITHOUT DRIVER CIRCUITRY: CESTAT
  5. SCN TOO VAGUE TO ESTABLISH REGULATORY VIOLATIONS BY CUSTOMS BROKER: CESTAT QUASHES LICENCE REVOCATION
  6. GLOW PLUG CONTROL UNIT CLASSIFIABLE UNDER CTH 8511: CESTAT QUASHES EXTENDED-PERIOD DEMAND AND PENALTY ON MARUTI SUZUKI
  7. CESTAT UPHOLDS RS. 7.24 CR. CUSTOMS DEMAND IN PCB UNDERVALUATION CASE
  8. KARNATAKA HC RECORDS ASG ASSURANCE THAT CISF WILL FURNISH COMPLETE CCTV FOOTAGE TO RANYA RAO IN GOLD SMUGGLING CASE
  9. UNICEF’S IGST REFUND CLAIMS WITHIN TIME, CESTAT RULES LIMITATION STARTS FROM 2019 CUSTOMS CIRCULAR
  10. LEGALITY OF GOLD CONFISCATION BASED ON RETRACTED STATEMENT QUESTIONED: MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT FRAMES 8 SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW

Excise Duty

  1. CESTAT UPHOLDS EXTENDED LIMITATION FOR INADMISSIBLE CENVAT CREDIT AVAILED DURING AREA-BASED EXEMPTION
  2. S. 114A PENALTY FOR USE OF FORGED DEPB SCRIPS UPHELD: CESTAT GRANTS 25% REDUCED PENALTY BENEFIT FOR TIMELY PAYMENT

Income Tax

  1. S. 43CA CAN’T APPLY TO LAND SALE TRANSACTIONS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED BEFORE PROVISION CAME INTO FORCE: ITAT 
  2. ITAT DELETES RS. 5.02 CRORE ROYALTY TRANSFER PRICING ADJUSTMENT, REJECTS UNEXECUTED FRANCHISE TEMPLATES AS CUP COMPARABLES

Corporate Law

  1. TIME-BARRED OPERATIONAL DEBT CANNOT REVIVE THROUGH IBC: SUPREME COURT QUASHES S. 9 INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that compensation claims arising from electrocution cannot ordinarily be...

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

The Supreme Court has held that re-employed officers constitute a distinct class for the...

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Indore has admitted an appeal challenging an order...

More like this

Electrocution Compensation Claims Involving Disputed Facts Can’t Be Decided in Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has ruled that compensation claims arising from electrocution cannot ordinarily be...

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

The Supreme Court has held that re-employed officers constitute a distinct class for the...