Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTTaxability of Solar Water Pumping and Rooftop Power Plant Works as Composite...

Taxability of Solar Water Pumping and Rooftop Power Plant Works as Composite Works Contract: GSTAT Admits Departmental Appeal 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Court No. I, Hyderabad, has admitted a departmental appeal concerning the GST treatment of installation and maintenance of solar water pumping systems and solar rooftop power plants. 

The dispute centres on whether such activities are liable to GST as a composite supply of works contract service. 

The matter was considered by a Bench comprising Sushil Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial), and Duvvuri Krishna Srinivas, Member (Technical).

Buy Now: 130 GST Judgments – E-Magazine July 2026

According to the order, the dispute relates to activities involving the installation and maintenance of solar water pumping systems and solar roof-top power plants.

The Adjudicating Authority had confirmed the duty demand raised in the relevant show-cause notice by treating the disputed works as a composite supply of works contract service. This classification formed the basis for the tax demand against the respondent.

However, the First Appellate Authority (FAA) took a different view and did not sustain the demand. The FAA consequently dropped the demand raised against the respondent.

The Department, aggrieved by the appellate decision, approached the GSTAT challenging the findings of the FAA.

During the hearing, the Departmental Representatives, Shri S. Gouri Shanker and Shri Mohd. Khalid, argued that the reasoning adopted by the First Appellate Authority in the findings portion of its order was not logical.

The Department therefore sought consideration of the issue by the GSTAT, particularly in relation to the treatment of the disputed solar-related activities as composite works contract services.

The order, however, does not record a final determination by the Tribunal on whether the installation and maintenance activities actually constitute a taxable works contract service. The present order is confined to the admission of the appeal and issuance of notice.

After hearing the arguments, the GSTAT Bench admitted the appeal. The Tribunal directed that notice be issued to the respondents through email or any other mode of electronic communication.

The matter has been directed to be listed after four weeks, giving the respondents an opportunity to respond to the Department’s challenge.

The central legal question arising from the appeal is whether the installation and maintenance of solar water pumping systems and solar rooftop power plants can be treated as a composite supply of works contract service for GST purposes.

The issue assumes significance because the original adjudicating authority had treated the disputed activities as works contract services and confirmed the demand, whereas the First Appellate Authority subsequently dropped the demand. The Department’s appeal seeks reconsideration of that appellate decision.

Importantly, the GSTAT’s August 10 order does not decide the substantive taxability issue. Admission of the appeal merely means that the Tribunal has agreed to examine the Department’s challenge.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GSTAT Admits Bharti Airtel’s Appeal on ITC Dispute Involving Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...