Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationDGFT Extends Export Obligation Period for Advance Authorisation Holders Importing Products under...

DGFT Extends Export Obligation Period for Advance Authorisation Holders Importing Products under QCOs

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, has announced amendments to the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2023, offering relief to Advance Authorisation (AA) holders, Export Oriented Units (EOUs), and Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

Through Notification No. 28/2025-26, issued on August 28, 2025, the government has revised Para 2.03(A)(i)(g) of FTP 2023, which governs export obligations related to imports subjected to mandatory Quality Control Orders (QCOs).

Earlier, the export obligation (EO) period for imports under Advance Authorisation was restricted to 180 days from the date of clearance of consignments in respect of QCO-exempted chemical products notified by the Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals (DCPC).

Under the new amendment, this restrictive clause has been removed, and the EO period has been uniformly extended to 18 months for all Advance Authorisation holders importing products under mandatory QCOs. Henceforth, the export obligation for such authorisations will follow the provisions outlined in Para 4.40 of the Handbook of Procedures, aligning all AA holders under a common compliance framework.

EO Period Extended: From the existing 6 months to 18 months for imports subjected to QCOs under DCPC.

Simplification of Compliance: The earlier restriction of 180 days for certain chemical products has been removed, reducing procedural hurdles.

Greater Flexibility: Exporters now have a longer timeline to meet their obligations, which is expected to ease compliance pressure and boost export competitiveness.

Read More: FIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Appellate Order Can’t Simply Confirm Tax Demand Without Examining Taxpayer’s Objections, Giving Reasons: GSTAT

The Raipur Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has sent...

Cash Refund Of Accumulated ITC Can Be Recovered As Erroneous Refund U/s 73 Of GST Act: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), has held that a cash refund...

Can Income Tax Dept. Retain Seized Cash Beyond 120 Days? Gujarat High Court Refers Rs. 5.68 Crore Dispute to Larger Bench

The Gujarat High Court has referred three questions concerning the release of cash seized...

More like this

Appellate Order Can’t Simply Confirm Tax Demand Without Examining Taxpayer’s Objections, Giving Reasons: GSTAT

The Raipur Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has sent...

Cash Refund Of Accumulated ITC Can Be Recovered As Erroneous Refund U/s 73 Of GST Act: GSTAT

The Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), has held that a cash refund...

Can Income Tax Dept. Retain Seized Cash Beyond 120 Days? Gujarat High Court Refers Rs. 5.68 Crore Dispute to Larger Bench

The Gujarat High Court has referred three questions concerning the release of cash seized...