HomeOther LawsFIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

FIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Bharatpur police have registered an FIR against Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone and several others after a customer alleged being cheated over manufacturing defects in his Hyundai Alcazar SUV.

The case was lodged at Mathura Gate police station on the basis of a complaint filed by advocate Kirti Singh (50), a resident of Bharatpur. Singh stated that he purchased the Hyundai Alcazar in 2022 from a Sonipat dealership for ₹23.97 lakh.

According to the complaint, the vehicle began showing serious technical problems soon after purchase. Singh alleged that the car vibrates excessively while accelerating or overtaking, fails to pick up speed, and repeatedly displays an engine management system malfunction warning. He claimed the issue has endangered his and his family’s safety on multiple occasions.

When he approached the dealership, Singh was allegedly informed that the problem stemmed from a manufacturing defect and was offered only temporary fixes. However, the problem persisted, causing him financial, physical and mental distress. Despite this, he continues to pay EMIs on the car loan.

The complaint also named Hyundai brand ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone, accusing them along with the company and its dealers of concealing the defect. Singh alleged this amounted to cheating, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy.

Police confirmed that an FIR has been registered under relevant sections of the IPC and further investigation is underway.

Read More: Rajnath Singh: “No Permanent Friends or Enemies, Only Interests” as India Faces Trump’s Tariff Offensive

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation? Supreme Court Issues Notice 

The Supreme Court issued notice in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) dispute concerning...

Legal Notice Alone Can’t Establish Tax Liability: CESTAT 

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

License Fee, Technical Assistance Charges Not Includible In Customs Value Unless They Are a Condition of Sale: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Investment in Mutual Funds Not ‘Trading’, No CENVAT Credit Reversal Required for Redemption of Units: CESTAT

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)...

More like this

Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation? Supreme Court Issues Notice 

The Supreme Court issued notice in a Goods and Services Tax (GST) dispute concerning...

Legal Notice Alone Can’t Establish Tax Liability: CESTAT 

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

License Fee, Technical Assistance Charges Not Includible In Customs Value Unless They Are a Condition of Sale: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...