Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsFIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

FIR Filed Against Hyundai Brand Ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Bharatpur police have registered an FIR against Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone and several others after a customer alleged being cheated over manufacturing defects in his Hyundai Alcazar SUV.

The case was lodged at Mathura Gate police station on the basis of a complaint filed by advocate Kirti Singh (50), a resident of Bharatpur. Singh stated that he purchased the Hyundai Alcazar in 2022 from a Sonipat dealership for ₹23.97 lakh.

According to the complaint, the vehicle began showing serious technical problems soon after purchase. Singh alleged that the car vibrates excessively while accelerating or overtaking, fails to pick up speed, and repeatedly displays an engine management system malfunction warning. He claimed the issue has endangered his and his family’s safety on multiple occasions.

When he approached the dealership, Singh was allegedly informed that the problem stemmed from a manufacturing defect and was offered only temporary fixes. However, the problem persisted, causing him financial, physical and mental distress. Despite this, he continues to pay EMIs on the car loan.

The complaint also named Hyundai brand ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone, accusing them along with the company and its dealers of concealing the defect. Singh alleged this amounted to cheating, criminal breach of trust and conspiracy.

Police confirmed that an FIR has been registered under relevant sections of the IPC and further investigation is underway.

Read More: Rajnath Singh: “No Permanent Friends or Enemies, Only Interests” as India Faces Trump’s Tariff Offensive

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...