HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Supreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has fixed a lump sum alimony of ₹8 lakh in a matrimonial dispute where the wife had sought Rs. 20 lakh from her estranged husband, a Zomato delivery boy.

The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan questioned the wife, a graduate, on her demand. “Who asked you to seek ₹20 lakh?”

The woman responded that she wished to pursue further studies and that her husband was not working properly with Zomato.

Justice Pardiwala, however, remarked, “Dekhiye, ye saudabazi achi nahi. Ek saal mein shaadi khatam ho gayi” (See, such bargaining is not good. The marriage ended within a year).

Taking into account the circumstances, the court ruled that ₹8 lakh would be a fair settlement.

Read More: CBIC Withdraws Circular on ITC Reversal Procedure for Post-Sale Discounts

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Madras HC Waives Requirement Of 10% Pre Deposit Of Penalty And Allow Appeals To Be Filed Without Pre-Deposit

The Madras High Court has waived requirement of 10% pre-deposit of penalty and allow...

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction and 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed...

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles 

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer in a significant...

Assessee Can’t Be Left Remediless Due To Improper Communication Of GST Order: Rajasthan High Court Condones Delay

The Rajasthan High Court has condoned the delay in filing a GST appeal after...

More like this

Madras HC Waives Requirement Of 10% Pre Deposit Of Penalty And Allow Appeals To Be Filed Without Pre-Deposit

The Madras High Court has waived requirement of 10% pre-deposit of penalty and allow...

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction and 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed...

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles 

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim relief to a taxpayer in a significant...