HomeOther LawsSupreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Supreme Court Disapproves of ‘Saudabazi’ in Matrimonial Case, Fixes ₹8 Lakh Alimony

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has fixed a lump sum alimony of ₹8 lakh in a matrimonial dispute where the wife had sought Rs. 20 lakh from her estranged husband, a Zomato delivery boy.

The Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan questioned the wife, a graduate, on her demand. “Who asked you to seek ₹20 lakh?”

The woman responded that she wished to pursue further studies and that her husband was not working properly with Zomato.

Justice Pardiwala, however, remarked, “Dekhiye, ye saudabazi achi nahi. Ek saal mein shaadi khatam ho gayi” (See, such bargaining is not good. The marriage ended within a year).

Taking into account the circumstances, the court ruled that ₹8 lakh would be a fair settlement.

Read More: CBIC Withdraws Circular on ITC Reversal Procedure for Post-Sale Discounts

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Latest articles

Whether ‘May’ Can Replace Mandatory Pre-SCN Consultation? Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Final GST Adjudication 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging...

Bank Certificate Can Substitute FIRC in GST Export Cases: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that GST authorities cannot mechanically confirm tax demands...

GST SCN Without Alleging Fraud Cannot Invoke S. 74: Karnataka High Court Quashes Adjudication Order

The Karnataka High Court has held that proceedings under Section 74 of the Central...

GST SCN Generated Using AI Tool Quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court 

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has quashed a GST Show Cause Notice (SCN)...

More like this

Whether ‘May’ Can Replace Mandatory Pre-SCN Consultation? Punjab & Haryana High Court Stays Final GST Adjudication 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer challenging...

Bank Certificate Can Substitute FIRC in GST Export Cases: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that GST authorities cannot mechanically confirm tax demands...

GST SCN Without Alleging Fraud Cannot Invoke S. 74: Karnataka High Court Quashes Adjudication Order

The Karnataka High Court has held that proceedings under Section 74 of the Central...